Somebody Make Sure Hillary Clinton Sees the Video Trump Just Posted Where She...
Judiciary Dems' Month-Old Tweet About Mahmoud Khalil Is Aging Worse by the Minute
Proposed Cuts to NOAA Have Lefties Melting Down Faster than Polar Ice Caps...
Lawrence O’Donnell Spreads Lie Trump Can Round Up American Citizens and Fly Them...
Election Deflection: James Carville Says There’s Voter Fraud but the SAVE Act Is...
Victor Davis Hanson: If One Wanted to Destroy the U.S. the Last Four...
Capitol Check-Ups: Marjorie Taylor Greene Wants Lawmakers to Pass Physicals and Undergo Dr...
On the Road (Again): Bernie Sanders Has Been on the ‘Fighting Oligarchy’ Tour...
You Don't Have to Go Home But You Can't Stay Here: Judge Rules...
Modern Audiences Don't Exist, but Hollywood Is Trying Hard to Create Them
BBC Journos Aghast a Politician Bases Her Views In Reality and Not on...
So Much for 'Tax the Rich', Huh? Whoopi Tells Americans to 'Suck It...
FLUSHED AWAY: Gavin Newsom Had Half a BILLION In Funding to Stop Mexican...
WATCH: Colorado Dad NUKES School Board for Alienating His Daughter In the Name...
There's Nothing 'Toxic' About Masculinity: POWERFUL New XX-XY Advertisement Celebrates Men

New York Times runs 'quit Catholicism' ad, refuses to run 'quit Islam' equivalent

Breitbart.com on Pamela Geller’s latest exposure of MSM and governmental double standards:

The New York Times has explained its double standard for running paid advertisements attacking different religions with concern for the safety of America’s soldiers.

After running the atheist organization Freedom From Religion’s ad telling readers “It’s time to consider quitting the Catholic Church,” Pamela Geller of the organization Stop Islamization of America created a parody ad stating “It’s time to quit Islam.” The Daily Caller reports:

According to a Mar. 13 letter sent by the Times to… Geller, the $39,000 anti-Islam ad was rejected because “the fallout from running this ad now could put U.S. troops and/or civilians in the [Afghan] region in danger.”

This is the same New York Times which published details of the Wikileaks documents leaked by Bradley Manning in 2010. The Times justified its decision to publish the details of the documents, stating that it removed information which could lead to the targeting of individual operatives:

The Times and the other news organizations agreed at the outset that we would not disclose — either in our articles or any of our online supplementary material — anything that was likely to put lives at risk or jeopardize military or antiterrorist operations. We have, for example, withheld any names of operatives in the field and informants cited in the reports.

But by publishing stories from these documents such as alleged murders of civilians, including a pregnant woman, the Times engaged in the same kind of general incitement against American troops the paper now cites in its rejection of Geller’s ad.

Advertisement

Read the whole thing.

The New York Times won’t print it because of its concern for US soldiers in harms way? They make us laugh.

Isn’t it time you quit the Times?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement