Flashback: Here's Nancy Pelosi Singing a (D)ifferent Tune on China, Trade Deficits, and...
‘Hmmm’: Adam Kinzinger Suspicious There Are No Tariffs on Russia
What a Peach! Watch Unhinged Leftist Crow About 'No FEMA' for Tornado-Impacted Red...
Tim Walz's Magical Media Tour Continues! He Tells MSNBC Voters Regret Electing Trump...
Not Even CLOSE, Bud! The Hill Wants Us to Believe the Pendulum Is...
Only 19% of Baltimore Kids Are Proficient in Math, So the District Spends...
Jamie Raskin Calls Fed. Employees Patriots, Claims They Pass Up MANY Rich Jobs...
U.S. Bans Romantic Relationships Between Gov Workers and Chinese Citizens, Eric Swalwell H...
EPIC Post from GenZ'r Explaining Why He's NOT Worried About His 401K DECIMATES...
Now That the Border Is Secure It's Safe for Dems to Go (Tom...
NBC News Scrapes the Bottom of the Barrel to Get a Nurse's Opinion...
CNN's Abby Phillip Gets Fact Checked to Her Face!
HORSES**T! Stephanie Ruhle Tries Lecturing MAGA About What THEY Voted for but Dean...
Chuck Schumer Triggered By Elon Musk's Spot-On 1-Word Post About Dems Suing to...
Fauci's WIFE? LOL! So... ABOUT Those Higher-Up Firings at NIH, You May Have...

Joe Scarborough discusses 'violence' inherent in SCOTUS' Dobbs ruling in what sounds like justification for *actual* violence [video]

Former GOP-congressman-turned-MSNBC-host-turned-Donald-Trump-sycophant-turned-Resistance-flag-waver Joe Scarborough has had the weekend to process the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision and this morning, he’s still struggling to understand how something like this could have happened in America.

Advertisement

Because there’s something inherently violent about determining that there’s no constitutional right to kill your unborn baby:

Another top-notch take from Joe Scarborough.

That certainly is a notable aspect of Joe’s little rant. It’s an aspect of many Principled Conservative™ Resistance Thought Leaders’ rants.

But Scarborough’s take is a hot mess in other respects. Like this one, for example:

Advertisement

It’s probably a pretty safe bet that he didn’t read it, yes.

That seems pretty generous, Mr. Cooke. Joe Scarborough’s more of a shoot-first-ask-questions-later-or-probably-never kind of guy, but we suppose that it’s technically possible that he read it. We know him to be both ignorant and dishonest.

Insane … and actually pretty dangerous, if you think about it.

They see making people angry as their job.

This language from Scarborough et al. is very deliberate:

Advertisement

They know exactly what they’re doing. They’re not denouncing potential violence so much as they are calling for even more of it.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement