Jamaal Bowman Pulls the Alarm: The NFL is 'Afraid' of Shedeur Sanders Because...
'Been Owed This for 5 Years'! Scott Jennings Calls Out Randi Weingarten's Lies...
Up Next for Dem Sen. Chris Van Hollen: Margaritas With Judge Dugan?
Massive Explosion Rocks Iranian Port of Bandar Abbas Causing Widespread Damage, Injuries (...
'This Is a Crime'! CNN Legal Analyst Throws a Wrench In Dems' Narrative...
Milwaukee Democrat Rep Encourages People to Obstruct ICE from Arresting Criminal Illegal A...
Scott Jennings Schools CNN Panelists on Why an Activist Judge’s Arrest Had to...
FOIA Revelation: Biden White House Labeled Libs of TikTok and Gays Against Groomers...
Ken Dilanian Loved Going After Trump but Thinks Arresting Judges Who Break the...
As More Activist Judges Get Arrested Let’s Remind Democrats that ‘No One Is...
Writer and Pop Culture Expert Says Draft Overlooking Shedeur Sanders is Like Whipping...
Epstein Accuser and Abuse Survivor Virginia Giuffre Found Dead by Suicide
Jamie Raskin is OUTRAGED that a Judge Could Face Justice for Allegedly Helping...
Kash Patel's 'No One Is Above the Law' Judicial Perp Walk Pic Is...
Guy Benson Questions 'Dill'-emma: Friend Ousted from Pickleball League Over Politics

Joe Scarborough discusses 'violence' inherent in SCOTUS' Dobbs ruling in what sounds like justification for *actual* violence [video]

Former GOP-congressman-turned-MSNBC-host-turned-Donald-Trump-sycophant-turned-Resistance-flag-waver Joe Scarborough has had the weekend to process the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision and this morning, he’s still struggling to understand how something like this could have happened in America.

Advertisement

Because there’s something inherently violent about determining that there’s no constitutional right to kill your unborn baby:

Another top-notch take from Joe Scarborough.

That certainly is a notable aspect of Joe’s little rant. It’s an aspect of many Principled Conservative™ Resistance Thought Leaders’ rants.

But Scarborough’s take is a hot mess in other respects. Like this one, for example:

Advertisement

It’s probably a pretty safe bet that he didn’t read it, yes.

That seems pretty generous, Mr. Cooke. Joe Scarborough’s more of a shoot-first-ask-questions-later-or-probably-never kind of guy, but we suppose that it’s technically possible that he read it. We know him to be both ignorant and dishonest.

Insane … and actually pretty dangerous, if you think about it.

They see making people angry as their job.

This language from Scarborough et al. is very deliberate:

Advertisement

They know exactly what they’re doing. They’re not denouncing potential violence so much as they are calling for even more of it.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement