Three Face Federal Antisemitic Hate Crime Charges in Pittsburgh: Local Media Largely Silen...
Rachel Maddow Shows There Are Convenient Exceptions to ‘No One Is Above the...
‘Dying’ for Attention: Protesters Unleash the Undeniable Power of Passively Lying on the...
No Need to Hire a Comedian When AP ‘Journalist’ Unintentionally Provides Biggest Laugh...
Andrew McCabe Says Case Against Judge Hannah Dugan is Solid but Arrest Was...
Rachel Maddow and Jamie Raskin Reveal the Dem Party’s New DEI - Dramatic...
Scott Jennings Schools CNN Panelists on why President AOC Would Be a Nightmare...
Another Night Surrounded by Democrats, Scott Jennings Attends the White House Corresponden...
Ontario Must Pay for Man to Have a Vagina Constructed While Leaving His...
Social Worker Has Absolute Meltdown Over Student Loans
Democrats Keep Proving Me Right (and I Hate It)
County Attorney Requiring Prosecutors to Consider Race When Offering Plea Deals
Hello, Gaslight! Democrat Jason Crow Earns EPIC Ratio for Lying About What His...
Susan Rice Goes on a Rant About White Male Christian Cisgender Macho MAGA...
J.K. Rowling Wants THIS Video Saved for Future Generations to See How Stupid...

'Amazing stuff': NYT busted trying to stealth edit grossly antisemitic take on AOC's tearful breakdown over Iron Dome vote [screenshots]

After the House voted yesterday overwhelmingly in support of funding Israel’s Iron Dome missile defense system, it was only natural that the New York Times would cover it. And they did:

Advertisement

But that’s not all the New York Times did in their coverage.

When it came time to talk about AOC’s little sobbing sesh, the language got a bit more … colorful. Have a look:

Quite a paragraph, no?

We’ll say this much for the New York Times: they’ve got chutzpah. Just broadcasting their antisemitism openly, for all the world to see.

Happens to the best of us.

Advertisement

That’s essentially what they did, yes.

Hey, there’s always tomorrow!

Well, now the New York Times is running interference for themselves. Or at least they’re trying to:

Advertisement

The New York Times might’ve gotten away with it, too, if it weren’t for those meddling pro-Israel lobbyists and rabbis! And screenshotters, of course.

So now everyone can see the New York Times for who they truly are: antisemites who really suck at covering their tracks.

Truly.

Apparently the New York Times thought it was worth showcasing their antisemitism in order to defend AOC. Too bad they suck at defending her just as much as they suck at trying to not look like bigots:

Advertisement

You could use it to bury the New York Times, but they’re doing that just fine on their own.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement