NYT’s David Brooks Doesn’t Have the Details but Is Sure Judges Who Obstruct...
‘It’s News to Us!’: ‘Journos’ Chided for ‘Missing’ Biden’s Cognitive Decline They Knew...
‘I’m Just a Shill’: Jeffries and Booker Take to the Capitol Steps for...
'Doing a GREAT Job, Guys!' Mary Katharine Ham DROPS ABC News for Their...
Jessica Tarlov Tries SHAMING MAGA Over Deported Illegal Kids, Gets BUSTED Pushing False...
Democrats Have Created the Most CONSERVATIVE Generation YET
Joy Reid Uses Roman Empire to Argue Against Electing White People - There's...
SYSTEMIC RACISM! WHCA Recognizes April Ryan While Camera Stays on THIS Black Female...
ADORBS! WHCA Awards Axios' Alex Thompson for 'BREAKING' Biden Cognitive Decline Story and...
No WAY! Here's the Guy They Arrested for Stealing Kristi Noem's Purse and...
Three Face Federal Antisemitic Hate Crime Charges in Pittsburgh: Local Media Largely Silen...
Rachel Maddow Shows There Are Convenient Exceptions to ‘No One Is Above the...
‘Dying’ for Attention: Protesters Unleash the Undeniable Power of Passively Lying on the...
No Need to Hire a Comedian When AP ‘Journalist’ Unintentionally Provides Biggest Laugh...
Andrew McCabe Says Case Against Judge Hannah Dugan is Solid but Arrest Was...

How about no? NBC News natsec contributor Frank Figliuzzi suggests 'bipartisan committee' to vet future POTUS candidates [video]

America’s facing a presidential crisis, and we’ve got to do something before it gets any worse.

NBC News natsec contributor Frank Figliuzzi’s come up with a possible solution.

Advertisement

Before you roll your eyes, hear him out:

 

OK, you can roll your eyes now.

Was it this one?

Well, in any event, Figliuzzi’s proposal is indeed dumb. Incredibly dumb. Especially when you consider his background:

One could certainly argue that Figliuzzi is counter-intelligent.

Advertisement

Thank you for your input, Frank, but if it’s all the same to you …

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement