'Caustic Discourse': GREAT Thread Explains How the Left Usurped Our Universities to Enact...
Becoming What They HATE: Thread Explaining Why Neocons Have Lost ALL Their Credibility...
YIKES: SoCal Media Station's X Account 'Accidentally' Shares Offensive Word, Blames 'Techn...
James Woods Has BRUTAL Words of Wisdom for Kamala Voter Who Thinks He...
Anti-Trump, Deep State Attorney Mark Zaid Whines About Losing His Security Clearance and...
HERE WE GO! ICE Arrests Illegal Alien Child Rapist Fairfax County Dems Have...
Dem Rep Regrets Laken Riley Act Vote and Explains Her Party's Approval Rating...
DEEP Thinker Kamala Harris Working to Form Her Own Ideas/Policy Institute and HA...
Trump Posts Viral 'Landman' Clip (Billy Bob Trigger Warning for the 'End Fossil...
BOOMITY! Charles Payne Takes Elitist, Leftist CNN Analyst APART for Trashing Blue-Collar A...
Attention Women, Eric Swalwell Thinks You're All Too Dumb to Get an ID,...
I've Had ENOUGH! Kevin O'Leary UNLOADS on MSNBC Host Who Tried Shaming Him...
Stephen Miller Sends Message to Judge Ruling These Illegals Biden Flew to the...
WHOA! At First, I Wanted to Make Fun of GenZ for This Story...
BYE, KAREN: Greenland Base Commander Relieved of Her Post After Publicly Undermining VP...

Sad! Blue-check columnist's meltdown over Richard Jewell's depiction of garbage journalism is actually 'a ringing endorsement' for Clint Eastwood's film

Clint Eastwood’s new film “Richard Jewell” has a lot of journalists very upset. No, not over what happened to Richard Jewell, but over how it makes some journalists look bad. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which spearheaded the smear campaign, is demanding “a statement publicly acknowledging that some events were imagined for dramatic purposes and artistic license and dramatization were used in the film’s portrayal of events and characters. We further demand that you add a prominent disclaimer to the film to that effect.”

Advertisement

Well, as we noted above, there’s no shortage of angry firefighters. But we wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t shine a special light on Philadelphia Inquirer national opinion columnist Will Bunch, who, coincidentally, has his panties in a bit of a bunch over “Richard Jewell”:

Having not seen the film ourselves, we can’t really comment on the film’s treatment of the “dead female journalist” Kathy Scruggs. But we do feel pretty confident in saying that Bunch’s real problem is that Eastwood’s film, unlike so many other Hollywood offerings, doesn’t depict journalists as heroic crusaders for truth and justice.

Advertisement

Naturally, the Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan — no stranger to biased hackery — is fully on board with Bunch’s characterization:

Won’t someone please think of the journalists?

It’s not Donald Trump’s fault that the media’s reputation is in the toilet. It’s not Clint Eastwood’s fault. The media built that; they made that happen. And because Clint Eastwood and “Richard Jewell,” unlike most of Hollywood, are actually holding garbage journalists responsible for their journalistic malpractice, the garbage journalists are pitching a fit.

Advertisement

Maybe instead of screaming at Clint Eastwood for making them look bad, journos like Will Bunch should take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Meanwhile, if Bunch et al. think their histrionics will keep Americans away from “Richard Jewell,” they’re in for a deservedly rude awakening.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement