Jamaal Bowman Pulls the Alarm: The NFL is 'Afraid' of Shedeur Sanders Because...
'Been Owed This for 5 Years'! Scott Jennings Calls Out Randi Weingarten's Lies...
Up Next for Dem Sen. Chris Van Hollen: Margaritas With Judge Dugan?
Massive Explosion Rocks Iranian Port of Bandar Abbas Causing Widespread Damage, Injuries (...
'This Is a Crime'! CNN Legal Analyst Throws a Wrench In Dems' Narrative...
Milwaukee Democrat Rep Encourages People to Obstruct ICE from Arresting Criminal Illegal A...
Scott Jennings Schools CNN Panelists on Why an Activist Judge’s Arrest Had to...
FOIA Revelation: Biden White House Labeled Libs of TikTok and Gays Against Groomers...
Ken Dilanian Loved Going After Trump but Thinks Arresting Judges Who Break the...
As More Activist Judges Get Arrested Let’s Remind Democrats that ‘No One Is...
Writer and Pop Culture Expert Says Draft Overlooking Shedeur Sanders is Like Whipping...
Epstein Accuser and Abuse Survivor Virginia Giuffre Found Dead by Suicide
Jamie Raskin is OUTRAGED that a Judge Could Face Justice for Allegedly Helping...
Kash Patel's 'No One Is Above the Law' Judicial Perp Walk Pic Is...
Guy Benson Questions 'Dill'-emma: Friend Ousted from Pickleball League Over Politics

'Covering for a liar': NYT goes to bat hard for Elizabeth Warren, attempts to shame Washington Free Beacon for doing actual journalism

As Twitchy told you earlier, MSNBC managed to address the current controversy surrounding Elizabeth Warren’s apparent lie about getting fired for being “visibly pregnant” by swallowing EMILY’s List VP of comms Christina Reynolds’ BS explanation for Warren’s evolving narrative.

Advertisement

The New York Times has essentially decided to follow suit, gathering as many water-carrying buckets as they can in order to defend Warren from the Washington Free Beacon’s journalism:

The New York Times is a lot more concerned about the Washington Free Beacon’s reporting undermining Elizabeth Warren’s narrative than they are about Elizabeth Warren undermining Elizabeth Warren’s narrative. Pathetic.

The entire piece basically does Elizabeth Warren’s dirty work for her, making her out to be the victim of a discriminatory policy as opposed to the perpetrator of yet another lie to perpetuate her victimhood narrative.

Advertisement

(That’s a rhetorical question, of course.)

Advertisement

Sounds about right.

It’s honestly hard to argue with that assessment.

Last word to the Free Beacon:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos