Buyer’s Remorse? Scott Jennings Lays to Rest Notion that MAGA Voters Are Leaving...
Victor Davis Hanson: Leftist Europeans Drew Inspiration From Democrat Party in Jailing Mar...
Elie Mystal Wants to Eliminate Voter Registration Laws Because He Claims Fraud Doesn’t...
Family-Run Brewery Destroyed by Hurricane Helene Gets Help Rebuilding From Unexpected Bene...
Cory Booker Say He Doesn’t Define Himself by Who He’s Against After Going...
Don’t Expect 24/7 Coverage of Teen Stabbed at Track Meet
Rep. Jasmine Crockett Is Going to Say She Doesn’t Like Elon Musk ‘50,000...
New Book: Barack Obama Worked 'Behind the Scenes' to Derail Kamala Harris
Letitia James Heard About a Head Start Program Closed Down Because of Trump's...
Stephanie Turner Female Athlete Who Refused to Fence Against a Male Speaks Out...
Listen, Fat: '60 Minutes' Is LYING to You About Obesity and Weight Loss
Katie Pavlich Has a GREAT Idea That Would Keep the Formerly Taxpayer Funded...
LOL: FactPost Wants You to Believe That Grocery Prices Have Already Increased By...
See You in Court! Michigan Judge Okay's White Man's Racial Discrimination Suit Against...
Sen. Mazie Hirono Declares Dan Bongino Is Not at All Qualified

Bless his heart: Max Boot deems Steven Mnuchin's middle finger to Dems 'another impeachable offense'

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin has officially denied House Ways and Means Chair Richard Neal’s request to release Donald Trump’s 2013-2018 tax returns:

Advertisement

Mnuchin writes:

As you have recognized, the Committee’s request is unprecedented, and it presents serious constitutional questions, the resolution of which may have lasting consequences for all taxpayers. Accordingly, the Department of the Treasury has consulted with the Department of Justice concerning the lawfulness of your request. As explained in my April 23 letter, the Committee’s statutory authority under section 6103(f) is bound by Congress’ authority under the Constitution, and the Supreme Court has held that the Constitution requires that Congressional information demands must reasonably serve a legitimate legislative purpose.

Seems pretty straightforward, and that explanation should be enough to satisfy sensible people. But it’s not good enough for Max Boot. Oh no. To Boot, it’s just another piece of the impeachment puzzle falling into place:

This is red meat, of course, for Boot’s fellow Resisters:

Advertisement

Meanwhile, the rest of us are over here trying to figure out what was so heinously offensive and impeachment-worthy about Mnuchin’s explanation.

If he does, he’s doing a great impression of someone who doesn’t. Alternatively, it’s possible that he does in fact know and just doesn’t care. In either case, he’s demonstrated that he’s nothing more than a tiresome hack.

That’s apparently the argument Boot’s going for, yeah.

That’s Max in a nutshell.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement