Happy Holidays Tweet from the ATF Doesn't Warm The Heart
If What the Teamsters Prez Told Tucker Carlson Is True It's No Wonder...
Merry Christmas: A Special Bonus Gift of Christmas Funnies Just for You
Simply ‘Wonderful’: Classic Holiday Film Reminds Generations It’s Okay to Cry at Christmas
A Lump of Coal in Her Stocking! Crypto Influencer Gets BURIED for Not...
Political Pivot? Many Question ‘Young Turk’ Cenk Uygur’s Sudden Willingness to Talk with...
'The View' Panelist Says Problem for Dems Is That Gov't Won't Regulate Social...
Man Vs. History: Bear Grylls Gets DROPPED by Community Notes for Awful Take...
Scott Jennings: Dem Party Must Flush the Fringe and Embrace Common Sense to...
HO HO OH LOL-NO! Leftist Mocked for Whining About the Midwest DAD We...
Bah Humbug! Dems Put Fetterman On The Naughty List
NewsGuard Rates the Headlines Covering Woman Set on Fire by Illegal
CNBC: Biden Administration Withdraws Student Loan Forgiveness Plans
'Mary Was An Earthworm:' J.K. Rowling Absolutely Roasts India Willoughby's Take on Christi...
University Employee Who Told Trump Supporters to Kill Themselves Sent Packing

GOP Sen. Ben Sasse warns that Twitter is setting 'a bad precedent' by banning Jesse Kelly

As Twitchy told you yesterday, Twitter recently suspended — and then permanently banned — Jesse Kelly. For what? Well, they never did say. But we feel pretty comfortable concluding that Kelly is just among the latest in a series of victims of Twitter’s double standard when it comes to acceptable speech.

Advertisement

This afternoon, GOP Sen. Ben Sasse, who himself has been on the receiving end of some of Kelly’s Twitter shots, called Twitter out for helping to set a “bad precedent” when it comes to free speech:

As some tweeters have pointed out in their responses to Sasse, Twitter is a private platform and it’s their prerogative to ban anyone they want to.

Yes, they can. But the issue is not their rules regarding speech; it’s their arbitrary enforcement of those rules.

Advertisement

If Twitter wants to ban users for “hate speech,” or whatever they want to call it, that’s fine. But then they need to clearly define what “hate speech” is and hold everyone to the same standard. Otherwise they’re admitting that they’re guilty of the bias of which they’re being quite credibly accused.

Amen to that.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement