Anyone else noticing a pattern when it comes to Brett Kavanaugh’s accusers? Because we’re pretty sure we’ve been here before:
“None of Ms. Swetnick’s claims could be independently corroborated by The New York Times, and her lawyer, Michael Avenatti, declined to make her available for an interview.”https://t.co/aRaZjjcbci
— Mujahed (@kebejay) September 26, 2018
"None of Ms. Swetnick’s claims could be independently corroborated by The New York Times, and her lawyer, Michael Avenatti, declined to make her available for an interview." #Basta
— Mark Hemingway (@Heminator) September 26, 2018
Well, knock us over with a feather.
Again? https://t.co/WBx4AXDaDX
— RBe (@RBPundit) September 26, 2018
Funny https://t.co/4FiN2nN5VN
— Pradheep J. Shanker, M.D., M.S. (@Neoavatara) September 26, 2018
Interesting. “Brave” and “courageous” indeed. #CreepyPornLawyer is a joke.
— PubliusFL (@FlPublius) September 26, 2018
This is my shocked face
— Farting Dog Saloon (@BanalAggressive) September 26, 2018
Surprise surprise surprise….!
— Grumpyauldjock (@GrumpyOldJock) September 26, 2018
Nobody saw that coming.
Wow. That’s really saying something if he wouldn’t let the NYT spin her story up.
— ToasterHead (@ToasterHead7) September 26, 2018
It really is.
***
Related:
WaPo shines glaring spotlight on GAPING holes in Julie Swetnick’s story
‘This is such BS’! Looks like Michael Avenatti just helped Julie Swetnick … right over the cliff
HOLY CRAP! Did Kavanaugh accuser Julie Swetnick accidentally admit that SHE committed a crime?
Join the conversation as a VIP Member