Dana Perino and Candace Owens were panelists last night on FNC’s “The Next Revolution with Steve Hilton.” That’s where Candace Owens suggested that the New York Times had written the now-infamous “Resistance” op-ed — and where Dana Perino flashed an expression that just said it all:
. @DanaPerino’s face as Candace Owens pushes the wild conspiracy theory that the NYT may have written the op-ed themselves to hurt Trump is a major mood. pic.twitter.com/ysM37DFJhg
— Caleb Hull (@CalebJHull) September 10, 2018
— Caleb Hull (@CalebJHull) September 10, 2018
That face is pretty much the face we make every time Candace Owens starts talking. Thus far, we’ve seen very little evidence that Owens really knows what she’s talking about.
Reminder:
— Caleb Hull (@CalebJHull) September 10, 2018
So yeah, it makes total sense for Perino to be skeptical of Owens.
— Yashar Ali ? (@yashar) September 10, 2018
We feel you, Dana.
God bless her. It's bad enough to have to be on a panel with those two but has to maintain composure in the wake of the "Maybe the NY Times wrote the op-ed themselves!" twaddle.
— Jay Caruso (@JayCaruso) September 10, 2018
Owens doesn’t deserve to be attacked for being a black “conservative,” but she sure as hell deserves to get called out when she says something awful or does something shady, both of which happen on a regular basis.
Owens and Kirk are disastrous grifters, pass it on https://t.co/F7y0Z9eeJW
— David Rutz (@DavidRutz) September 10, 2018
Yep.
I for one welcome our new GOP grifter overlords.
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) September 10, 2018
Heh.
Parting question:
if we donate them to the liberals, would it be considered regrifting?
— Jeryl Bier (@JerylBier) September 10, 2018
Editor’s note: This post has been updated with an additional tweet.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member