Rep. Marcy Kaptur Asks Which Country Elon Musk Will Be Loyal To When...
J.K. Rowling Helpfully Explains How Women With Penises Are Like Wizards
Kash Patel Needs to Clean House! Check Out What This Former FBI Agent...
WATCH: Former Minnesota DOC Employee SHAMES Democrats for Letting Men Into Women's Prisons
Media Self-Own Alert! Chuck Todd Points Out Which Journalistic Enterprises Are Not to...
'Your Country Is the United States of America!' JD Vance Reminds a Constituent...
Paging Tom Homan! Madison, WI Sheriff Issues Memo Saying His Department Will NOT...
WILDCARD WEDNESDAY: Gold Cards, Joyless Reid, and the Jonas Brothers
Politico Really Hopes the Conservative SCOTUS Justices They Hate Will Rein in Trump's...
After Threatening to Sue Trump Admin, Maine Dems Censure Republican Critic of Gov....
MTG Slams the Door on Moskowitz’s Desperate Democrat Stunt: The Queen of ‘No’...
Adam Schiff Slams Jeff Bezos for Not Burning WaPo to the Ground to...
Oh, Great, Gavin Newsom’s Podcast Is Here to Save Us—Because California’s Totally Fixed...
Jeff Bezos Just Nuked 'The Washington Post,' & Lib Media Is Not Happy...
Actress Michelle Trachtenberg Dead at 39

TOLERANCE! Jason Alexander envisions NASTY fate for climate change heretic Scott Pruitt

EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt committed climate change heresy when he had the gall — the gall! — to suggest that climate change isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

Advertisement

A breathless Nick Visser writes at the HuffPost:

Scott Pruitt, the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, alluded earlier this week that global warming may be beneficial to humans, once again questioning the world’s leading scientists who have declared the phenomenon one of the greatest known threats to humanity.

In an interview that aired Tuesday on KSNV, a Nevada television station, Pruitt questioned how accurately scientists could predict the planet’s ideal temperature in 2100, or even this year, and said humans had “flourished” in times of past warmth.

“We know humans have most flourished during times of what, warming trends,” Pruitt said during the interview. “I think there’s assumptions made that because the climate is warming, that that necessarily is a bad thing. Do we really know what the ideal surface temperature should be in the year 2100, in the year 2018?”

He continued: “That’s fairly arrogant for us to think that we know exactly what it should be in 2100.”

How dare Pruitt point out that climate change is anything but a new phenomenon or suggest that humans don’t have all the answers! The Democrats are just beside themselves with shock and disgust:

Advertisement

Jason Alexander isn’t too pleased, either:

Because tolerance.

Heh.

https://twitter.com/byronic_queero/status/961672660508819456

Or latex sales.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement