If using a play that has raked in $100 of millions is not the best argument for forcing taxpayers to subsidize the arts, nothing is! #Caring https://t.co/oEReF6VXYu
— Derek Hunter (@derekahunter) March 16, 2017
Oh, the humanity! Add the L.A. Times to the list of media outlets flipping their lids over Trump’s budget, which could result in funding cuts to, among other things, the National Endowment for the Arts:
What is the National Endowment for the Arts? Without it, we wouldn't have 'Hamilton' https://t.co/acOwG7usWv pic.twitter.com/v1b2raYVYh
— Los Angeles Times (@latimes) March 16, 2017
What? No “Hamilton”?! Well, that’s it, then:
Well then I think it's settled.#AbolishTheNEA https://t.co/BywZLqPyiS
— Dr. Kankokage (@kankokage) March 16, 2017
Hey, it’s really the only sensible option.
Defund it completely https://t.co/npBNykPDdZ
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) March 16, 2017
Well that made it even easier, defund it.
— Mark Nova (@iMarkNova) March 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/LiberalHeretic/status/842511380091719680
Seriously, though. If “Hamilton” is the best reason the L.A. Times can come up with to keep government money flowing to the NEA, then they’ve got nothin’.
Recommended
Not exactly persuasive.
— Honey Badger (@SalsaPrice) March 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/LibertAmerican/status/842516565241319429
not sure you're going to win converts with this line of argument.
— Buck Stickland Fan Account (@bacrook24) March 16, 2017
Wow, really selling it to middle America. https://t.co/zH9Jmq8gUA
— JavelinaBomb (@javelinabomb) March 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/javelinabomb/status/842517644573986816
. @HamiltonMusical is grossing $1.9 million a week. Grossing. Every week. https://t.co/tUvKrazgz8
— Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) March 16, 2017
https://twitter.com/BecketAdams/status/842524255346737152
https://twitter.com/SethAMandel/status/842515802251321345
You mean rich progressive liberal democrats would have to bear the financial responsibility to entertain themselves? ??????
— Jake R. (@jaker1419) March 16, 2017
A play that is so expensive most Americans can't afford a SINGLE TICKET. But do go on about taxpayer funding. https://t.co/7moqnPiXcL
— Stacy Washington (@StacyOnTheRight) March 16, 2017
Oh, you want to subsidize musicals that only rich people can afford the tickets to? Let them fund their own amusements. @latimes
— Goldens Rule (@jamesbranch3) March 16, 2017
give government money to arts that make a ton of money already, isn't this the rich getting richer?
— Loren (@LorenSethC) March 16, 2017
D’oh.
Are you trying to convince me it's a good idea to get rid of the NEA?
— Red Elephant Army (@RedElephantArmy) March 16, 2017
That time the @latimes accidentally argued to completely abolish the NEA and was successful in their argument :https://t.co/IPaKsiSvrK
— JAG (@Drum747) March 16, 2017
***
Related:
SHOCKER: ‘Hamilton’ star who rapped about Obamacare will fundraise for Hillary
Join the conversation as a VIP Member