Awww, this is nice. Looks like Hilary Rosen and Jonathan Chait have a kindred spirit in Media Matters’ Eric Boehlert:
gave the Clinton Foundation $50K, but who's keeping track….. https://t.co/uY49q1XrJ4
— Eric Boehlert (@EricBoehlert) May 14, 2015
Not Eric, apparently. Guess he missed the news that George actually donated at least $75K:
@EricBoehlert 75k
— JamesKirkLives (@JamesKirkLives) May 14, 2015
Oops. Well, no matter. What bothers him isn’t that Stephanopoulos is super-sketchy and ethically challenged, but that the good name of the Clinton Foundation is being besmirched!
"tainted" because of a donation to charity. interesting days…..
— Eric Boehlert (@EricBoehlert) May 14, 2015
You know what’s really interesting, Eric?
You put the scare quotes on the wrong word. RT @ericboehlert: "tainted" because of a donation to charity. interesting days…..
— Moke ? (@Moke453) May 14, 2015
Yep.
Huh? This is about the Clinton Foundation, not a charity. Try to keep up, Eric. https://t.co/DqouExdqfl
— RBe (@RBPundit) May 14, 2015
https://twitter.com/RobProvince/status/598933376578367489
.@RobProvince @EricBoehlert The taint is in the "charity". Weird how uranium investors all got "tainted" too.http://t.co/Pwzry09UmI
— Hootyman (@TheHootyman) May 14, 2015
@EricBoehlert LOL at "charity."
— #OH_Robb (@OH_Robb) May 14, 2015
@EricBoehlert huh… pic.twitter.com/EujTfX42RS
— SalonFeed (@SalonFeed) May 14, 2015
That’s some “charity,” all right.
@EricBoehlert Rush said it is a slush fund, so yeah…
— Wade (@TheVeritable) May 14, 2015
@TheVeritable at this pt, half the DC press treats Clinton Foundation as "slush fund." makes the story so much more interesting…..
— Eric Boehlert (@EricBoehlert) May 14, 2015
Dude. It is a slush fund.
Because charities are never corrupt… http://t.co/EUiBWU0qqU
Smart take https://t.co/7GlhGtTZB8— PissedOffPeasant (@mikepfingston2) May 14, 2015
so people shouldn't donate to charities….smart take. https://t.co/3JcJKzmu9g
— Eric Boehlert (@EricBoehlert) May 14, 2015
Almost as smart as yours, Eric!
@EricBoehlert @ScaldingHotTake if it's not a big deal, why did GS apologize? It's the failure to disclose, btw, not the fact that he gave.
— Matthew Kelsey (@mkkelsey) May 14, 2015
correct. he should have disclosed. i'm just laughing out loud at pple who scandalize a donation to a charity. https://t.co/zN0uXEvlsx
— Eric Boehlert (@EricBoehlert) May 14, 2015
Good Lord. For the last time, buddy:
https://twitter.com/Me_In_Jersey/status/598934886393581568
Editor’s note: This post has been updated with additional text.
***
Related:
Slimy: Did ABC leak the Stephanopoulos story to Politico so the Free Beacon wouldn’t get the scoop?
Dang! How bad is ABC’s defending dirtball George Stephanopoulos? This bad
Video: Watch George Stephanopoulos grill Bernie Sanders on his criticism of the Clinton Foundation
A Jim Geraghty exclusive! Hey, look who’s shaming George Stephanopoulos [photo]
‘Just another foundation oopsie’? Did Stephanopoulos actually donate more than $50K?
‘ACORNing’? Glenn Thrush’s nutty defense of Clinton Foundation swiftly panned
‘Where did you pull that from?’ CNN contrib Hilary Rosen’s take on Stephanopoulos is ‘precious’
‘OOPsie!’ Turns out George Stephanopoulos DID give more than $50k to Clinton Foundation
‘Peak, complicit hackery’: Jonathan Chait’s defense of Stephanopoulos falls on its face
Join the conversation as a VIP Member