Oops! Chelsea Clinton 'loved @PattyArquette's speech'; Forgot about Hillary's 'problematic' wage history

Add Chelsea Clinton to the long list of libs swooning over Oscar winner Patricia Arquette‘s stirring — and woefully ignorant — call to end the so-called “gender wage gap”:

Loved @PattyArquette’s speech at the #Oscars last night & all the attention it’s given to #EqualPay: http://t.co/lOEfFocyKD #NoCeilings

— Chelsea Clinton (@ChelseaClinton) February 23, 2015

Hey Chelsea, you might wanna have a talk with your darling mother …

your mom pays $.72 to women for every $1.00 to men #truth RT @ChelseaClinton: @PattyArquette’s speech #EqualPay: http://t.co/B2yzCQDRlF

— Buffett (@stockoracle) February 23, 2015

@ChelseaClinton @PattyArquette according to Senate documents @HillaryClinton paid women in Senate office $.72/$1 to men while she was Sen.

— Bullitino (@Bullitino) February 23, 2015

Ruh-roh:

Hillary Clinton portrays herself as a champion of women in the workforce, but women working for her in the U.S. Senate were paid 72 cents for each dollar paid to men, according to a Washington Free Beacon analysis of her Senate years’ salary data.

During those years, the median annual salary for a woman working in Clinton’s office was $15,708.38 less than the median salary for a man, according to the analysis of data compiled from official Senate expenditure reports.

…

Signs indicate there will also be large gender pay gap on Clinton’s 2016 campaign staff.  The Washington Post reported last week that Clinton will rely on “President Obama’s heavily male campaign apparatus” to run her upcoming presidential campaign.

Recommended

FAFO Diplomacy: Scott Jennings Explains How Colombia F’d Around with Trump and Found Out

Warren Squire

Advertisement

Awk-ward!

So @HillaryClinton paid her female staffers 72 cents for each dollar paid to a male staffer. http://t.co/JNZYASLBEW #WarOnWomen

— Ashley Pratte (@AshPratte) February 23, 2015

https://twitter.com/SonnyBunch/status/569841394342346752

https://twitter.com/NoahCRothman/status/569852770754408449

https://twitter.com/AndrewStilesUSA/status/569865737390723072

Very problematic indeed, Chelsea.

***

Related:

‘PATRICIA 4 PREZ’: Patricia Arquette wins for best supporting actress and gets political

‘Spontaneous synergy, or planned propaganda’? Labor Dept all over Patricia Arquette’s demand for ‘wage equality’

Twitchy coverage of Chelsea Clinton