Quiet Riot: The Women’s March Will Remember January 6 with Moment of Silence...
Meltdown Montage: Jesse Watters Shares ‘ELON MAKES DEMOCRATS CRAZY’ Video
Scott Jennings Educates CNN Panel on the Difference Between Our Functional President and...
USAID Staff Worldwide Placed on Paid Administrative Leave Starting Friday
New York Times Economy Reporter Pooh Poohs Massive Fraud and DOGE's Work
Congresswoman Shouts 'WE ARE AT WAR' at 'Nobody Elected Musk' Rally
My Dinner With A-Hole - Wallace Shawn Comes Out As Full Anti-Zionist
Wokeness Is a Terminal Diagnosis
Prof Says the Worst-Case Scenario Is That Trump's 'Lawlessness' Proves Popular
You Meant Biden, Right? Senator Patty Murray Engages in MASSIVE Projection About 'Corrupt'...
The Nation: Prepare for 'MAGA's White Whine' as Super Bowl Showcases Black Excellence
President Trump Sees America Taking Over Gaza
BREAKING: President Trump Announces the United States Will Take Over Gaza
WINNING: Pam Bondi Confirmed as Next Attorney General
Hooray for Hollywood? Joe Biden May Be the Only Person Unaware He Signed...

Busted! NYT sneakily changes lede on 'Christie knew' article without issuing correction [pic]

That’s what’s known as an “evergreen tweet.” You could send out that tweet anytime and it’d still be relevant.

So, what’s The New York Times done now? Oh, you know. Just taken some journalistic liberties. Nothing major:

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/michaelscherer/status/429369229822144512

Scherer is referring to the Times’ article claiming that New Jersey Governor Chris Christie “knew about lane closings.” In other words, according to the Times, Christie was aware of what was going on during the traffic mess that later became known as “Bridgegate.” Kate Zernike, who wrote the article, originally wrote that David Wildstein, former Port Authority official, had evidence proving Christie’s guilt.

Now, the article says something else:

Well, well! What a difference a few words makes.

https://twitter.com/lachlan/status/429366481831624704

Indeed. Now, why on earth would The New York Times ever do something like that?

Ah.

That’s one heck of a news organization you’ve got there, New York Times.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/bccohan/status/429371301296603136

https://twitter.com/SonnyBunch/status/429370008834424832

https://twitter.com/lachlan/status/429370136085417984

Even Piers Morgan is disappointed:

And when you’ve lost Piers … well, you know.

That’s just crazy talk!

Editor’s note: This post has been updated with additional tweets.

***

Related:

Twitchy coverage of the “Bridgegate” scandal

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement