Did Pam Bondi Really Steal a St. Bernard? Journalism Has Gone to The...
MSNBC Contributor Asks If We Want Someone Who Made Terror Watch List as...
ABC News Tell You How to Join Bluesky
Will 'Journos' Ever Learn?: X is the Mainstream, Not The Atlantic and Other...
Conservatives Not Pleased With Trump's Labor Secretary Nominee
Mayor of Denver Seems to Walk Back Threat to Use Police to Prevent...
Chief Diversity Officer at the NIH Retiring at the End of the Year...
Mark Cuban Goes Full BlueAnon Accusing Elon Musk of Having Bot Army
Trump's Surgeon General Nominee Praised Facebook for Its Censorship During COVID
Biden Says He Left the Country Better Off Than 4 Years Ago (Which...
WH's 'Building a Better Future' Post With Pic of Kamala Harris Waving Goodbye...
U.N. Secretary-General Seems a Bit Concerned His 'Climate Finance' Is Drying Up
J.K. Rowling Continues to Be Enemy Number One to the Left With Her...
WHAT THE EUGENICS? Academic Writes That We Should Find Someone Better to Bear...
'Full of S**t'! Megyn Kelly Reenacting Phoniness From MSNBC's Joe & Mika Is...

Molly Jong-Fast Fact-DROPPED for Claiming EVIL Republicans Are Trapping Pregnant Women in EVIL Marriages

Twitchy/Meme

What do you want to bet Molly Jong-Fast didn't bother to actually look up the Missouri law she's clutching her pearls over?

Advertisement

Luckily, other women were happy to set Molly straight (not that she'll pay attention or care).

That.

Being the investigative journalists we are (stop laughing) we decided to look into this EVIL BILL in Missouri and we found it. Of course, it says nothing like what Jong-Fast is pushing or the drama queens in her comments BUT she doesn't care about that. She cares about the drama and politics involved so women will freak out and vote for crappy Biden.

From hartsoelaw.com:

Under Chapter 452.310 of Title XXX of the Missouri Revised Code, a person petitioning for divorce must disclose – among other information – whether or not the wife is pregnant at the time. If she is, the court will not finalize the divorce until after the child is born.

FACT: pregnant wives CAN file for divorce in Missouri.

Why won’t the court finalize the divorce if a wife is pregnant?

Missouri courts will not finalize the divorce of a couple where the wife is pregnant because they want all outstanding issues regarding child support and child custody to be resolved first. Per Fox 2 Now News:

[T]he courts will not finalize or grant the divorce until after the child is born in order to establish paternity. When a married woman becomes pregnant, the husband is assumed to be the father under the law…. Courts prefer to issue one judgment in divorce proceedings, and granting visitation rights for a fetus or child while in utero is considered speculative. This also allows a husband and wife going through a divorce to seek a paternity test to determine biological and legal parentage.

Advertisement

So yes, women can file for divorce, and they can leave their husbands, the courts just won't finalize things until the child is born so that paternity, custody, and other issues can be decided. This is not a new law, this is not some Handmaid's Tale thing ... it's just a law making sure the unborn child has what he or she needs. Much to Molly's disappointment, it's not some evil plan by Republicans now that Roe has been overturned, it's just the law.

And it's pretty clear.

Maybe if Jong-Fast and the other hyenas would spend a little time doing some research? They'd save themselves a lot of freak-outs. Nah, if they did that whatever would we write about and laugh at?

======================================================================

Related:

Pro-Palestine 'Death Cult' CELEBRATES US Airmen Aaron Bushnell's Suicide After He Succumbs to Injuries

Go HOME Google, You're Drunk: Megyn Kelly's Post ROASTING Google and Their Woke AI is Brutal PERFECTION

Law Prof Explains How Fani Willis' Terrible, Horrible, No-Good, Very-Bad Month is About to Get Even WORSE

Gosh, Golly, Gee, Can't Help But Notice AP Left Out an IMPORTANT Part of the Georgia Killer's Description

Such GLORIOUS Shrieking! SNL Shares Shane Gillis' Hilarious Anti-Woke Monologue and Lefties Can't DEEEAL

======================================================================

Editor's Note: Hi there. I know it's been some time since we changed this up but changing it up now to see if any of you read this far. How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? Also, if you are reading this far please sign up for Twitchy VIP and help us continue bringing you the truth, especially the truth Biden and his Big Tech goons don't want us sharing.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement