W Is for 'Winsome Sears': Why Republicans MUST Win the Virginia Election This...
Scott Jennings Has Advice for GOP While Shooting Down CNN Guest’s Theory MAGA...
Silver Lining Losers: Jake Tapper and Dana Bash Try to Mine Victory from...
Cory Booker’s Record 25 Hour Filibuster Overshadowed by Dem Party’s All-Time Low 21%...
Sinking Fast: Polling Shows Democrat Party Plummeting to Lowest Approval Rating Ever (and...
Woman Claims MAGA Woke the Beast, Promises Woke 2.0
Mixed Bag: Republicans Lose Wisconsin Supreme Court Race but Get Surprising Voter ID...
TIME: Marie Le Pen’s Conviction Was a Good Day for French Democracy
Rep. Pramilla Jayapal Launches ’Resistance Labs’ to Be 'Street Ready' to Fight Trump
Decision Desk HQ Projects Susan Crawford to Win Wisconsin Supreme Court Seat
Sam Stein: Absolute BLOODBATH at HHS/NIH/CDC
Tilting at Windmills: Crockett and Company Are Trying to Save Women From the...
Claire McCaskill Says Pete Hegseth is Embarrassing and the Troops Know It
While We're Abolishing DEI, Let's Do Away With Helicopter Parenting Other People's Kids,...
Judge Blocks Administration From Revoking Temporary Protected Status of 350,000 Venezuelan...

'A lot of people in the media hate Trump': Brit Hume's interview with COVID lockdown skeptic Alex Berenson a must-read

Brit Hume has been sharing tweets from COVID lockdown skeptic Alex Berenson for several weeks (months?!) and it has been a welcome balance to the constant ‘death march panic’ of the legacy media. We have spent a good amount of time covering Brit and Alex as well, mainly because we know what they’re saying and reporting is not getting the attention it deserves.

Advertisement

This interview between these two ‘voices of reason’ is lengthy but definitely worth a read:

Yup, he used to work for the New York Times which makes this all the more fascinating.

From the Fox News interview:

But I would say the first thing when my radar really went off as a journalist was on March 25th. Neil Ferguson, who is the author of, the lead author, of the seminal paper, the Imperial College Paper, that said two million Americans might die if we did nothing about this, gave testimony in Britain where he reduced his estimate for the number of people who would die from 500,000 to 20,000 now. Now, the 500,000 number assumed no mitigation efforts at all in Britain. OK. But the paper came out on March 16th. And in that paper, it says that even with reasonable mitigation efforts, a quarter of a million people will die. And a week later, nine days later, he testified to the British government that the most likely number was 200,00. And I thought to myself, how on earth did we get from 250000 to 20000 in a matter of days?

Advertisement
Read the whole interview.

How DID we get from catastrophic projections to below-flu-level numbers? Hrm. Excellent question.

This is a good point.

Berenson himself in the interview admits he’s an Independent.

Why aren’t they doing this sort of analysis? Excellent question.

Advertisement

Much like Brit himself.

Yes.

As we said, a much-needed voice of reason in an age of constant panic.

***

Related:

Embrace the FAIL: Jennifer Rubin’s snooty poll trying to shame states who are opening businesses BACKFIRES in a glorious way

Well, THAT’S embarrassing: Katie Couric tries deleting tweet calling for outlets to stop airing Trump’s briefings (but we got it)

‘Are you STUPID or just a liar?’ CBS’ Weijia Jiang who embarrassed herself during Trump’s Sunday presser doubles down and HOOBOY

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement