Rachel Maddow Shows There Are Convenient Exceptions to ‘No One Is Above the...
‘Dying’ for Attention: Protesters Unleash the Undeniable Power of Passively Lying on the...
No Need to Hire a Comedian When AP ‘Journalist’ Unintentionally Provides Biggest Laugh...
Andrew McCabe Says Case Against Judge Hannah Dugan is Solid but Arrest Was...
Rachel Maddow and Jamie Raskin Reveal the Dem Party’s New DEI - Dramatic...
Scott Jennings Schools CNN Panelists on why President AOC Would Be a Nightmare...
Another Night Surrounded by Democrats, Scott Jennings Attends the White House Corresponden...
Ontario Must Pay for Man to Have a Vagina Constructed While Leaving His...
Social Worker Has Absolute Meltdown Over Student Loans
Democrats Keep Proving Me Right (and I Hate It)
County Attorney Requiring Prosecutors to Consider Race When Offering Plea Deals
Hello, Gaslight! Democrat Jason Crow Earns EPIC Ratio for Lying About What His...
Susan Rice Goes on a Rant About White Male Christian Cisgender Macho MAGA...
J.K. Rowling Wants THIS Video Saved for Future Generations to See How Stupid...
Conor McGregor Expresses His Support for Irish Marchers Against Mass Immigration

NO mercy! Byron York takes Gordon Sondland APART for changing his testimony to save his OWN backside

As far as the Left is concerned, Gordon Sondland has gone from a total leper to some sort of HERO and all because he magically changed his tune. Funny isn’t it, how they so quickly go from hating to worshiping someone based on the amount of damage they perceive they can do to Trump.

Advertisement

But you know, this isn’t political or anything.

Byron York wrote an exceptional piece on Sondland and why he lied …

From the Washington Examiner:

By many accounts, Gordon Sondland delivered the most consequential testimony of the House Democrats’ rushed public impeachment proceedings. Sondland, U.S. ambassador to the European Union, testified in the impeachment hearings Wednesday. He grabbed headlines with a carefully worded opening statement that said:
I know that members of this committee have frequently framed these complicated issues in the form of a simple question: Was there a “quid pro quo?” As I testified previously, with regard to the requested White House call and White House meeting, the answer is yes.

Media reaction was instantaneous. Here was a key participant confirming a quid pro quo in the Ukraine affair, something President Trump has long denied. Sondland’s statement, many reports said, was a “bombshell.” A “blockbuster.”

Now, with a little hindsight, Sondland’s words appear to be something very different: an attention-grabbing and enormously clever gambit to get Sondland out of a jam in which he might have been accused of lying to Congress.

Advertisement

‘Attention-grabbing and enormously clever gambit to Sondland out of a jam’.

Ouch and damn.

Notice how quickly folks came out of the woodwork to defend their new hero … luckily Byron never missed a beat.

Except he lied, one way or another.

Sounds like Sondland has some ‘splainin’ to do.


Related:

OMG that’s right! @TrumpWarRoom’s thread on Adam Schiff’s attempt to get ‘dirt’ on Trump from Ukraine is pretty damn DAMNING

Advertisement

WOW: Brit Hume shares piece on the ‘shaky basis for impeaching Trump’ from a law professor … who’s also a Democrat

‘Disturbing’: Sharyl Attkisson notices 1 VERY TELLING thing all diplomatic witnesses have in common and it ain’t good for Schiff

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos