TRIGGERED: Feminists FREAK over NYT piece summarizing how abortion industry USES women

Would someone PLEASE check and see if Hell froze over because The New York Times put out an opinion piece we actually agree with … on abortion:

Perfect summary of how the abortion industry marginalizes women & ignores the underlying issues that drive abortionhttps://t.co/SCoPQ4BEOS

— Stacey (@ScotsFyre) May 9, 2017

From The New York Times:

Activists see a lot of appeal in this argument, a way to bridge the gap between liberal women and economic populists. But it comes with enormous baggage.

Above all, it’s a profoundly dehumanizing argument. It reduces mothers and their children to mere economic objects, and amounts to saying we are justified in killing those who impede our economic progress. Parenting presents undeniable challenges, but no one argues that those challenges give parents the right to kill their children.

SO MUCH BOOM.

And of course, with that much boom, the pro-aborts, feminists and SJWs came out of the woodwork totally FREAKED OUT about the piece … especially Jill Filipovic who wrote a whole DIATRIBE on her timeline:

https://twitter.com/JillFilipovic/status/861963688483409922

Here we go.

https://twitter.com/JillFilipovic/status/861963836160606208

You mean it costs money to raise children? No kidding.

https://twitter.com/JillFilipovic/status/861964031833276416

Because women are TOTALLY weak and victims of their circumstances and situations.

Recommended

Buyer’s Remorse? Scott Jennings Lays to Rest Notion that MAGA Voters Are Leaving Trump Over Tariffs

Warren Squire

Advertisement

It's beyond me how humans survived for centuries without government programs. https://t.co/SknQ0vc4W6

— Federalist Musket?? (@Patriot_Musket) May 9, 2017

How any true feminist can buy this crap is beyond us … seriously?

https://twitter.com/JillFilipovic/status/861964294837198848

But for many of them it’s ignoring their own responsibilities and not being accountable for the choices they make.

Fixed it for her.

And having a baby is akin to being chained up and having to gnaw a leg off to escape?

I find this op-ed eerily anti-choice. "Killing children"? This writer sounds like she works at a bait and switch clinic.

— Casey Cipriani is on Maternity Leave (@CaseyCip) May 9, 2017

Eerily anti-choice. If we rolled our eyes any harder we’d have to go to the ER and have them checked.

These people.

And yes, abortion kills children. What part of that confused her?

The bottom line on abortion is this: Even *if* a fetus is considered a full "person", you cannot be be forced by law to keep another 1/

— Sharon M (@ssminore) May 9, 2017

If a fetus is a person … you cannot be forced to keep another person alive.

What do they think a fetus is? A bag of hammers?

person alive. You can't be forced to donate a kidney for eample, even if it wld save another's life, even your own *born* child's life. 2/x

— Sharon M (@ssminore) May 9, 2017

*sigh*

The fact they think wanting to preserve life is a forced action says so much about them and their gross movement.

Related:

‘Our children are watching’: Kamala Harris drops f-bomb in public because Democrats are SO edgyhttps://t.co/fXcZnWhIjf

— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) May 9, 2017