The New York Times is so adorable, and by adorable we mean ridiculous and annoying. Thanks though, Ian, for posting this snippet of their lame article because it would appear you have to subscribe to read the whole hot mess …
And look out folks, there is CHATTER.
Trump's corrupt use of personal business ventures for duties of governing will be a key 2018 rallying cry for Dems.https://t.co/m5ntZVTIdb pic.twitter.com/ThPQZcGhYF
— Ian Sams (@IanSams) November 19, 2016
Chatter leads to a rallying cry for Democrats in 2018?
Up to your neck in real scandal in the Obama WH and you couldn't be bothered. Get out of the way while we start to #DrainTheSwamp!
— Eye Of Covfefe™ (@ProgPoker) November 20, 2016
Who cares if it happens when you can make it up ahead of time and publish it in the NY Times?
— Bob Fary (@RSFNYR) November 20, 2016
Wow. You guys are really stretching it, and there are still two months until he becomes President.
— Johnny Clueless (@lunatickfringe) November 20, 2016
They seem awfully anxious …
This is why the Democrats keep losing, Ian.
It's usually a good idea to ignore any sentence that begins "there is chatter…." https://t.co/XzRVqbu5OD
— Brit Hume (@brithume) November 20, 2016
BINGO. With so much reporting about fake reporting you’d think the New York Times would maybe figure out that chatter doesn’t mean a whole lot.
In fact chatter could just be two snotty little aides sitting around a Starbucks bitching about Donald Trump over a soy pumpkin spice latte and talking smack on Twitter.
Granted, the NYT would likely still consider them a solid source but still.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member