Because INCLUSION. C'mon MAN, Princeton's HR Dept. says THIS word's gots to go

Man.

That’s it.

Man. Yup.

Princeton's HR Department wants to do away with the word “man” to foster "an inclusive environment.” https://t.co/Xkz1Y7ZNiP

— Heat Street (@heatstreet) August 18, 2016

Apparently the word “man” makes things less inclusive? Don’t ask us man, we just work here.

Yes, we’re going to try and write “man” as many times as we can … man.

Or "Princesston", "departwoment" and "environwoment", please.

— Yownas (@Yownas) August 18, 2016

Mailwomen, Women In Black, Firewomen … that just sounds weird. Woman of steel?

Meh.

Man.

Perhaps we should get rid of the term Ivy League since it is not inclusive of all plants.

— John Rocco (@johnrocco2016) August 18, 2016

Daffodil. Tulip. Stop oppressing plants, man.

@benshapiro C'mon MAN!

— Chuck (@ChuckDBACKS) August 18, 2016

C’MON MAN!

https://twitter.com/Cl0seT0ThE3dge/status/766335725822472192

That’s spot on, man.

@benshapiro what about the word "prince"?

— Andrew Abbott (@AndrewAbbott) August 18, 2016

Princesston? Heh.

@INerodaeI face palm

— Pami Q (@Duckypam) August 18, 2016

Not enough face palm in the world, man.

Man.

https://twitter.com/RelevantQuest/status/766334480109809664

Man.