Rachel Maddow Shows There Are Convenient Exceptions to ‘No One Is Above the...
‘Dying’ for Attention: Protesters Unleash the Undeniable Power of Passively Lying on the...
No Need to Hire a Comedian When AP ‘Journalist’ Unintentionally Provides Biggest Laugh...
Andrew McCabe Says Case Against Judge Hannah Dugan is Solid but Arrest Was...
Rachel Maddow and Jamie Raskin Reveal the Dem Party’s New DEI - Dramatic...
Scott Jennings Schools CNN Panelists on why President AOC Would Be a Nightmare...
Another Night Surrounded by Democrats, Scott Jennings Attends the White House Corresponden...
Ontario Must Pay for Man to Have a Vagina Constructed While Leaving His...
Social Worker Has Absolute Meltdown Over Student Loans
Democrats Keep Proving Me Right (and I Hate It)
County Attorney Requiring Prosecutors to Consider Race When Offering Plea Deals
Hello, Gaslight! Democrat Jason Crow Earns EPIC Ratio for Lying About What His...
Susan Rice Goes on a Rant About White Male Christian Cisgender Macho MAGA...
J.K. Rowling Wants THIS Video Saved for Future Generations to See How Stupid...
Conor McGregor Expresses His Support for Irish Marchers Against Mass Immigration

Buzz: Did New York Times break Sandusky judge's order on verdict, and will the paper be held in contempt?

As we noted tonight, the judge in the Jerry Sandusky child molestation trial ordered media outlets to wait until court was adjourned to transit the verdict.

According to Twitter buzz, local journos believe the New York Yimes ignored the rules.

Advertisement

Here was the NYTimes tweet announcing the verdict at 10:08pm Eastern:

Will there be consequences?

https://twitter.com/schwincat05/status/216356665040191490

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/kevinmclark/status/216352564281737216

Fishwrap of Record motto: Rules for thee, but not for NYT.

Some observers are cheering the Times:

FYI:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos