Journalism, schmournalism!
#Journalism https://t.co/xN32QhmoPg
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) June 25, 2015
What sparked that? Well, take a gander at the giddy absurdity from HuffPo journo Jonathan Cohn when the Supreme Court ruled today 6-3 that Obamacare subsidies are legal:
6-3!!!!!!!!!!!!
— Jonathan Cohn (@CitizenCohn) June 25, 2015
YES!!!!!!!!!!!
— Jonathan Cohn (@CitizenCohn) June 25, 2015
A win for sanity — but, more important, for the millions of people who won't lose health insurance.
— Jonathan Cohn (@CitizenCohn) June 25, 2015
Roberts says "it is implausible" that Congress intended for law to function without subsidies — and cites Scalia dissent in NFIB. Zing.
— Jonathan Cohn (@CitizenCohn) June 25, 2015
Roberts: "The whole point of .. federal fallback" was to create functional exchange for states that don't. Exactly.
— Jonathan Cohn (@CitizenCohn) June 25, 2015
“The government couldn’t have won bigger." http://t.co/Iow0mUwotA
— Jonathan Cohn (@CitizenCohn) June 25, 2015
Good grief. His feed continued with more breathless giddiness that was beyond embarrassing and beyond parody. But here is some schooling for the Obama cheerleader:
@CitizenCohn And who still cant keep doc and who didnt save $2000/yr and have worse coverage and still waiting for worse stuff to hit.
— Chris Tsotsoros (@ctsotsoros) June 25, 2015
Recommended
@CitizenCohn Oh yeah, they wouldn't lose their health insurance. Only the gov't subsidies paying for it. Meanwhile we did actually lose ours
— Ricky Clarke III (@RickyClarkeIII) June 25, 2015
And an excellent exit question for the lapdog:
@CitizenCohn Well I lost my plan that I liked. Why didn't you care when that happened?
— Ricky Clarke III (@RickyClarkeIII) June 25, 2015
We won’t hold our breath for an answer.
Related:
‘How ironic’: Search is on for Sally Kohn’s self-awareness after SCOTUS ruling on Obamacare
Join the conversation as a VIP Member