Andy Ngo: Biden’s DOJ Made Payments to BLM/Antifa to Settle Lawsuits
Jesuit Priest Wants Us to Remember Jesus Was a Refugee
It's Time to Say 'Sayonara' to Woke Lefties Destroying Entertainment
The Mooch Has Thoughts on Dr. Phil Joining ICE Raids in Chicago and...
CNN Says Trump's DEI Cuts Will Harm Poor Rural Communities
Democrats' Future in Dire Straits: Bleak Outlook Ahead
Didn't Newsom Cut Red Tape? CA Residents Left Homeless From Wildfires Need PERMIT...
Chew on THAT: X Users Are VERY Skeptical About New Study Tying Red...
NEW RULES: Cynical Publius BEAUTIFULLY Breaks Down The Traditional D.C. Way Vs. The...
Odd Sort of 'Mercy': USCCB Rebuke J.D. Vance's Criticism of Catholic Church's Illegal...
Compare, Contrast! Donald & Melania Trump's Official WH Photos from 2017 vs. 2025...
Oh, Please! 'The Bulwark' Suddenly Champions Trans Rights to Save Conservatism ... What...
Follow the Science! New Study Shows School Closures Had No 'Basis or Benefit'...
Selena Gomez's Cringe-Fest ... Defends 'Deported Illegals' with Clearly Fake Tears
WATCH: Leftist Loon Tells Other Womens to Go Full KAREN on ICE and...

Reality is hard: Obama's favorite economic reporter Paul Krugman uses 'It's a Wonderful Life' bank to slam Romney

And the ever-wrong and unemployable David Shuster joins in.

https://twitter.com/#!/MHB2012/status/204954032782053378

https://twitter.com/#!/DavidShuster/status/204687171616112640

Advertisement

Oh, dear. As Twitchy reported last month, President Obama calls Paul Krugman “one of the smartest economic reporters out there.” Good grief!

While accusing Mitt Romney of not understanding banking, he uses a fantasy from a movie as an example of how one should understand banking. No, really.

Here’s what the presumptive Republican presidential nominee said about JPMorgan’s $2 billion loss (which may actually have been $3 billion, or $5 billion, or more, but who’s counting?): “This was a loss to shareholders and owners of JPMorgan and that’s the way America works. Some people experienced a loss in this case because of a bad decision. By the way, there was someone who made a gain.”

What’s wrong with this statement? Well, suppose that someone — say, Jimmy Stewart in the movie “It’s a Wonderful Life” — runs a bank that takes in deposits and invests the money in various ways. And suppose that one of those investments is a risky bet on some complex financial instrument, with Mr. Potter, the evil plutocrat, on the other side.

If Jimmy Stewart’s bet pays off, we’re in Romneyworld: he’s made money, Mr. Potter has lost money, and that’s that. But suppose Jimmy Stewart loses his bet. If the bet was big enough, he no longer has enough assets to pay off his depositors. His bank collapses, probably in a chaotic bank run that takes down the whole town’s economy as collateral damage. Mr. Potter makes money on the deal, but so what?

Advertisement

For Paul Krugman, not only is math hard but reality is hard. Twitter users were quick to correct the “smartest economic reporter out there.”

https://twitter.com/#!/LMBigSur/status/204801762987749377

https://twitter.com/#!/GPollowitz/status/204951314671742976

https://twitter.com/#!/GPollowitz/status/204951495362355200

https://twitter.com/#!/MediaTopCop/status/204687628895928320

https://twitter.com/#!/GPollowitz/status/204953384137138176

That will be giggle-snort worthy!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement