Amazing: We had the same dream.
The New York Times fired Jill Abramson from her position as executive editor and the New York Times is on it … sort of:
The New York Times Ousts Its Executive Editor, Elevating Second-in-Command http://t.co/cBgLRlBfXQ
— The New York Times (@nytimes) May 15, 2014
What a scoop! RT @nytimes: The New York Times Ousts Its Executive Editor, Elevating Second-in-Command http://t.co/Jx1VcSOrkv
— Mary Katharine Ham (@mkhammer) May 15, 2014
The pesky questions about whether the oh-so-feminist Times paid Abramson less than her male predecessor and a male deputy managing editor are being covered elsewhere.
NYer's Auletta reports Abramson had attorney make 'polite inquiries" about pay differences… http://t.co/PewHD6pO7R
— Byron York (@ByronYork) May 15, 2014
https://twitter.com/NoahCRothman/status/466919213685555200
Ken Auletta: Jill Abramson firing 'broader than' equal pay http://t.co/USdMyihY9d via @POLITICO
— Dylan Byers (@DylanByers) May 15, 2014
https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/466908320566358017
But don’t worry, guys. The sanctimonious NYT’s “editorial position is still pro-skirt.” Who ordered the schadenfreude stew with a side of giggles? Photoshopper @Slublog at your service:
BREAKING: Tomorrow’s NYT front page: pic.twitter.com/Vn82pMCEpb
— Peter Cook (@_Peter_Cook) May 15, 2014
Related:
‘War on women is coming from inside the house!’ John Ekdahl re-tweets NYT pay equity sanctimony
‘How great is this?!’ Jim Geraghty reminds NYT of headline they can re-use for Jill Abramson story
‘Need to follow some new people’: Jill Abramson’s NYT exit fills Twitter feeds with journo buzz
Join the conversation as a VIP Member