'Been Owed This for 5 Years'! Scott Jennings Calls Out Randi Weingarten's Lies...
Up Next for Dem Sen. Chris Van Hollen: Margaritas With Judge Dugan?
Massive Explosion Rocks Iranian Port of Bandar Abbas Causing Widespread Damage, Injuries (...
'This Is a Crime'! CNN Legal Analyst Throws a Wrench In Dems' Narrative...
Milwaukee Democrat Rep Encourages People to Obstruct ICE from Arresting Criminal Illegal A...
Scott Jennings Schools CNN Panelists on Why an Activist Judge’s Arrest Had to...
FOIA Revelation: Biden White House Labeled Libs of TikTok and Gays Against Groomers...
Ken Dilanian Loved Going After Trump but Thinks Arresting Judges Who Break the...
As More Activist Judges Get Arrested Let’s Remind Democrats that ‘No One Is...
Writer and Pop Culture Expert Says Draft Overlooking Shedeur Sanders is Like Whipping...
Epstein Accuser and Abuse Survivor Virginia Giuffre Found Dead by Suicide
Jamie Raskin is OUTRAGED that a Judge Could Face Justice for Allegedly Helping...
Kash Patel's 'No One Is Above the Law' Judicial Perp Walk Pic Is...
Guy Benson Questions 'Dill'-emma: Friend Ousted from Pickleball League Over Politics
Judiciary Dems Begin Campaign of Lies to Defend Judge Who Allegedly Helped Illegal...

Former adviser explains why VP Pence 'had no choice...but to accept and count the Electoral College votes'

Former federal judge J. Michael Luttig, and adviser to Mike Pence, took to Twitter to explain why the then Vice President “had no choice on January 6, 2021, but to accept and count the Electoral College votes as they had been cast and properly certified by the states”:

Advertisement

He is writing in response to reporting from Bob Woodward and Robert Costa and a memo sent to President Trump from John Eastman outlining a 6-step plan that had Pence refusing to count electors from alleged disputed states, thus sending the election to the House of Representatives which would have certified Trump as the winner:N

Memo here:

Luttig tweeted, “I believe(d) that Professor Eastman was incorrect at every turn of the analysis in his January 2 memorandum” and that “the Supreme Court would have decided each of these issues had they been presented to the Court, which they undoubtedly would have been had the VP proceeded as outlined in the January 2 memorandum.”

Advertisement

THREAD ==>

Advertisement

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement