What the Puck? Trump Suggests NHL Superstar Wayne Gretzky Replace Justin Trudeau
Church of England Warns Clergy About Christmas Carols With 'Problematic Words'
Matt Yglesias: Why Aren't Conservatives Bothered by Crime in Conservative States?
Taylor Lorenz Extremely Stressed About Getting a Rush Visa ASAP
People Have Fun With Idea That 'Hunnikah' Celebrates a Jewish Gorilla War
Christmas Is a Miracle and You Don't Need to Look Further Than North...
Happy Holidays Tweet from the ATF Doesn't Warm The Heart
If What the Teamsters Prez Told Tucker Carlson Is True It's No Wonder...
Merry Christmas: A Special Bonus Gift of Christmas Funnies Just for You
Simply ‘Wonderful’: Classic Holiday Film Reminds Generations It’s Okay to Cry at Christmas
A Lump of Coal in Her Stocking! Crypto Influencer Gets BURIED for Not...
Political Pivot? Many Question ‘Young Turk’ Cenk Uygur’s Sudden Willingness to Talk with...
'The View' Panelist Says Problem for Dems Is That Gov't Won't Regulate Social...
Man Vs. History: Bear Grylls Gets DROPPED by Community Notes for Awful Take...
Scott Jennings: Dem Party Must Flush the Fringe and Embrace Common Sense to...

NYT photographer debunks AOC's dopey Hope Hicks 'glamour shot' narrative

As we told you over the weekend, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (and others!) were quite miffed at the New York Times for running this “glamour shot” of Hope Hicks along with an article on whether or not she will comply with a House subpoena:

Advertisement

Here’s the photo from the NYT’s Tom Brenner that set her off:

Now for the real story. That photo is not a “glamour shot” at all and was just a normal photo of Hicks at work:

Brenner didn’t even know Hicks would be in the room before he took the photo:

Advertisement

And we’ll note that maybe AOC is not the best one to be complaining about using glamour shots to humanize someone in politics. Remember this?

***

Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement