Here’s President Obama from his address to the nation last week on the threat of ISIS:
As I have said before, these American forces will not have a combat mission — we will not get dragged into another ground war in Iraq. But they are needed to support Iraqi and Kurdish forces with training, intelligence and equipment.
And now the reality from General Dempsey:
U.S. General Backs Limited Ground Operations Against ISIS if Needed http://t.co/wFl3jXAADM
— The New York Times (@nytimes) September 16, 2014
The reaction:
“@nytimes: U.S. General Backs Limited Ground Operations Against ISIS if Needed http://t.co/KyrdaShjPQ” #missioncreep
— Kougen (@kougenxia) September 16, 2014
@nytimes no boots on the ground pls
— kissinger Iyawe (@iyawe) September 16, 2014
https://twitter.com/TheBigCracker/status/511912524154150912
Duh duh duuuuuh “@nytimes: U.S. General Backs Limited Ground Operations Against ISIS if Needed http://t.co/Eb7fzXH0pX”
— Carl Fridh Kleberg (@FridhKleberg) September 16, 2014
https://twitter.com/mbayer1248/status/511915231572803584
Senate hearing on ISIL: Sen Inhofe says "no boots on the ground" promise by Obama is insult to troops in #Iraq now
— CODEPINK (@codepink) September 16, 2014
So, when does the Nobel committee ask for its prize back?
Related:
Meet the Canadian ‘cheerleader’ for ISIS
Talking Points Memo editor uncovers bridge between social conservatives and ISIS
O’bummer: You will not believe who the U.S. just asked for help in fighting ISIS
Join the conversation as a VIP Member