FAFO Diplomacy: Scott Jennings Explains How Colombia F’d Around with Trump and Found...
Large Group Terrorizes Drivers Blocking Streets in Dallas While Demanding Open Border with...
J.B. Pritzker Should Ask Colombia How Opposing Trump's Immigration Policies Worked Out
Doctors With Borders: Dr. Phil Makes Surprise Appearance in Chicago Criminal Illegal Alien...
Chuck Schumer Is Saddened the Left-Wing Vandals Democrats Love Finally Hit a Business...
LOL: Check Out How Poorly These Leftist Posts on Colombia Aged
DISHONEST: Check Out How Much Time WaPo Gave Steven Cheung to Respond to...
Dawn of Deportations: ICE Makes Morning Illegal Alien Arrests in Democrat Sanctuary City...
Not Our Problem: Haitian Leader Says Trump's Policies Will Be Catastrophic for His...
Democrats Suddenly Realize Eggs Are Expensive Days After Biden’s Exit
J.D. Vance Drops a TRUTH BOMB on U.S. Catholic Bishops Over Immigration Opposition
Race-Baiting Grifter Al Sharpton Becomes the Spokesperson for Costco’s Discriminatory DEI...
They Really Mean It THIS Time! New Yorker Says Trump Is a Fascist...
Party Crashers: DEA and ICE Take Nearly 50 Tren de Aragua Gang Members...
Shot Across the Bow: Trump Warns Teachers Who Push Trans Ideology on Kids...

Correspondents or Collaborators? Shocking New Report About Embedded Photographers on Oct. 7

Meme

The role of a photojournalist in war must be horrific at times. You may be witness to unspeakable atrocities, and your job is to document those atrocities for the world to see. For example, anyone old enough remembers the photo that AP photographer Eddie Adams took during the Vietnam War of a South Vietnamese police officer walking up to a Vietcong prisoner on the street and brutally executing him with a gun to his head. The photo won a Pulitzer Prize and is often cited as changing the course of the war.

Advertisement

But where is the line between 'war correspondent' and 'terrorist collaborator'? A shocking new report from Honest Reporting suggests that many photographers working for the AP, CNN, The New York Times, and Reuters may have crossed that line, and it raises some serious new questions for our media organizations, whose credibility is already underwater.  

On October 7, Hamas terrorists were not the only ones who documented the war crimes they had committed during their deadly rampage across southern Israel. Some of their atrocities were captured by Gaza-based photojournalists working for the Associated Press and Reuters news agencies whose early morning presence at the breached border area raises serious ethical questions.

What were they doing there so early on what would ordinarily have been a quiet Saturday morning? Was it coordinated with Hamas? Did the respectable wire services, which published their photos, approve of their presence inside enemy territory, together with the terrorist infiltrators? Did the photojournalists who freelance for other media, like CNN and The New York Times, notify these outlets? Judging from the pictures of lynching, kidnapping and storming of an Israeli kibbutz, it seems like the border has been breached not only physically, but also journalistically.

Advertisement

The report then details each of the photojournalists who were on the scene and the photos they took, all of which beg several questions. How were they there on the morning of the attack without foreknowledge? Did they, in fact, collaborate on the terrorist attacks? And, perhaps most importantly, if they had foreknowledge, did they communicate it to these news agencies? If the answer to that final question is yes, it is a damning indictment of all of them (one of which, as a reminder, once shared office space with Hamas).

The media needs to answer to this report, fully and transparently. And they need to be held to account. 

Advertisement

Yes, we all know that adage. But this report may take it to monstrous new levels. 

This is an important point as well. Unlike the example we cited at the top of this article, there was no war between Israel and Hamas on October 6. Hamas committed an unprovoked savage act of terrorism on October 7. So, even calling them 'war correspondents' may not apply here. 

Imagine if the AP had photojournalists following the Sept. 11 terrorists as they went through flight training and coordinated their plans ... and said nothing about it. Those photographers -- and the media who employed them -- would be in prison for the rest of their lives, if not worse.  

And there's another problem. The media has so thoroughly demolished their credibility over the past several years that almost no one will be willing to give them even a shadow of the benefit of the doubt here.

Advertisement

It's not unreasonable to assume that all of these photographers were sympathetic to -- if not fully in league with -- Hamas. In fact, Ari Hoffman of Human Events offered a detailed thread explaining that this is exactly who they are. 

But the critical question is: what did the AP and other agencies know, and when did they know it? 

Of course, the mainstream media will probably never report on this. It is devastating to them. 

But Congress, independent media, and all individuals must call for transparency. If any of the questions being asked here are true, this isn't just a failure of journalistic ethics. It is complicity in crimes against humanity. 

Advertisement

Demand answers.  

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement