Elon Musk Smacks Down Reuters’ Starlink Whoppers Since Facts Are Apparently Optional
Shocker! Habiba Hamid, Ex-Newsweek Hack, Can’t Figure Out Who to Blame for a...
Associated Press Continues to Act As Hamas' PR Firm With Insulting Headline About...
Elizabeth Warren Trips Hard Over Obama While on the Warpath Against Trump's Firing...
I Noted Who Looked Away, and I'll Never See Them the Same Again
'Beyond Parody': Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers Fires New Salvo in the Democrats' War...
Right on Cue! The New Trump, Musk and DOGE Media Talking Point Has...
J.D. Vance Chalks Up ANOTHER Win, Takes Rep. Seth Moulton to History Class...
'That's What We Voted For!' Adam Schiff's Bad Month Just Got Worse and...
CNN Journo Quotes 'Retired 4-Star General' to Slam Trump Over Joint Chiefs Firing...
How About NO? Canadian Writer DEMANDS Wayne Gretzky 'Explain' His Relationship with Donald...
What Trump's Looking Into Selling in S.F. Couldn't Be More Hilariously Symbolic
The Nation Mourns as Experts Warn There Might Not Be Enough IRS Agents...
The Department of Justice Accuses Judge of Misconduct in Transgender Military Ban Case...
Leavitt Behind: Trump’s Young Press Secretary Explains Why She Ditched Her Binder After...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement