Politico Really Hopes the Conservative SCOTUS Justices They Hate Will Rein in Trump's...
After Threatening to Sue Trump Admin, Maine Dems Censure Republican Critic of Gov....
MTG Slams the Door on Moskowitz’s Desperate Democrat Stunt: The Queen of ‘No’...
Adam Schiff Slams Jeff Bezos for Not Burning WaPo to the Ground to...
Oh, Great, Gavin Newsom’s Podcast Is Here to Save Us—Because California’s Totally Fixed...
Jeff Bezos Just Nuked 'The Washington Post,' & Lib Media Is Not Happy...
Actress Michelle Trachtenberg Dead at 39
Eli Lilly Throws $27 Billion at America Because Tariffs Twisted Their Arm and...
The MSNBC Purge Continues: Most of Maddow's Staff to Be Let Go (But...
NYC Mayor Adams’ Biblical Meltdown Is Either a God Complex or Political Desperation
‘There’s No Bottom for These People:’ Jake Tapper to Release Book on Cover...
Chuck Schumer's 'What a Good Business Operator Would Do' Slam on DOGE Collapses...
Join Us! Here's How YOU Can Help Counter Dem/Media Lies About Trump's Agenda
Brian Stelter Didn't Always Think It Was Wrong to Ask If a Media...

There's Some Disagreement With ABC's Climate Correspondent As to 'How Science Is Done'

ImgFlip

ABC News took another deep dive into "science" with a story about the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration adjusting climate data, and now we're being told that's just normal and good science:

Advertisement

In the ABC News report, the climate correspondent explained "that's how you do science."

There is some disagreement with that statement:

The full post from Steve Milloy @JunkScience:

ABC News "Chief Climate Correspondent" @Ginger_Zee says it's okay that NOAA adjusts temperature data "because that's how you do science." 🙄

Actually, no, that's not how science is done. Adjusting temperature data is not "science" because the adjustments are not and cannot be verified, especially when verification would require traveling back in time. 

If anything it's going back in time and making updated guesses, which certainly can't be called "science."

This story calls claims that NOAA goes back to adjust climate data a "conspiracy theory" and then in the same breath admits that, yes, it does happen:

Advertisement

The archive of weather data in the United States is recorded by the Historical Climatology Network, a data set of temperature, precipitation and pressure records from long-standing stations around the county, managed and analyzed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

When digging into conspiracies claiming that the federal agency "manipulates" its historical weather data, ABC News' chief meteorologist and chief climate correspondent Ginger Zee was able to confirm that it was true -- but that the routine, public adjustments to records happen for good reason.

If you're keeping track of the shift, adjust your programs accordingly because here where things are now:

We've seen a lot of that kind of thing lately.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos