Federal Workers Shocked to Learn They're Not Royalty and Forced by Trump to...
Eight More Years! President Trump Trolls Media by Hinting He’s Ready to Serve...
He’s Everywhere! ‘Journalists’ Lament Energetic, Omnipresent Trump After Boring Biden’s Ca...
‘Hatch’ Act: Elie Mystal Goes on Race Rant Blaming White People for Trump...
Remaining Red: Florida Republicans Celebrate Nikki Fried’s Democrat Party Chair Victory
Stand-Up Guy: Trump Creates Comedy Skit Out of Sleepy Joe Biden’s Inability to...
Maddow in Tears! Trump Predicts the Demise of ‘Enemy of the People’ MSNBC...
Brit Goes Undercover With the Far-Right Patriotic Alternative for BBC
America’s Golden Age: White House Releases List of Trump’s Actions Over His First...
Here’s a Peek at Anthony Fauci’s Old Taxpayer-Funded Security
President Donald Trump Announces We Are Now in a Merit-Based World
The Left's Warped View of Women Is Bound to Backfire
'USA! USA!' Trump Hit a Vegas Casino and What Happened Next Is a...
Historian Amazed by How Well Fed and Looked After Released Hamas Hostages Appear
Following Pete Hegseth's Confirmation, Media Double Down on Former Sister-in-Law's Debunke...

Glenn Greenwald finds Washington Post's current handling of imploded Steele dossier reporting 'absolutely bizarre'

The Washington Post media critic Erik Wemple has for many months been upfront in asking the paper to come clean about their egregiously bad reporting on the Steele dossier. We noted a couple of days ago that the Post has gone as far as to add a disclaimer of sorts to their story about the indictment of Igor Danchenko, a Russian analyst who worked on the dossier. The Post’s story on the arrest concludes this way:

Advertisement

The Post continues to try and work their way through without making any retractions, which Wemple says might be necessary:

Journalist Glenn Greenwald goes through what seems to be unfolding, starting with Wemple explaining why retractions might be necessary:

A media critic attempting to get comment from his own paper but to no avail just sums it all up perfectly:

Advertisement

They’re just hoping it all goes away. How very “journalism” of them.

LOL! If anything it’ll be buried inside the paper and in the smallest print possible.

***

Related:

WaPo fact-checker says Durham’s ‘stunning indictment’ means ‘Christopher Steele’s sources were really bad’ (then it gets awkward)

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement