Becoming What They HATE: Thread Explaining Why Neocons Have Lost ALL Their Credibility...
YIKES: SoCal Media Station's X Account 'Accidentally' Shares Offensive Word, Blames 'Techn...
James Woods Has BRUTAL Words of Wisdom for Kamala Voter Who Thinks He...
Anti-Trump, Deep State Attorney Mark Zaid Whines About Losing His Security Clearance and...
HERE WE GO! ICE Arrests Illegal Alien Child Rapist Fairfax County Dems Have...
Dem Rep Regrets Laken Riley Act Vote and Explains Her Party's Approval Rating...
DEEP Thinker Kamala Harris Working to Form Her Own Ideas/Policy Institute and HA...
Trump Posts Viral 'Landman' Clip (Billy Bob Trigger Warning for the 'End Fossil...
BOOMITY! Charles Payne Takes Elitist, Leftist CNN Analyst APART for Trashing Blue-Collar A...
Attention Women, Eric Swalwell Thinks You're All Too Dumb to Get an ID,...
I've Had ENOUGH! Kevin O'Leary UNLOADS on MSNBC Host Who Tried Shaming Him...
Stephen Miller Sends Message to Judge Ruling These Illegals Biden Flew to the...
WHOA! At First, I Wanted to Make Fun of GenZ for This Story...
BYE, KAREN: Greenland Base Commander Relieved of Her Post After Publicly Undermining VP...
A Tale of Two Rivers: Trump Stops Water Delivery in Response to Mexico...

Jeffrey Goldberg gives a Memorial Day push to The Atlantic's incredibly dubious hit piece on Trump from last year

Last year, The Atlantic published a story alleging that then President Trump referred to soldiers fallen in times of war “losers” and “suckers.” The Atlantic’s story also claimed that, while visiting John Kelly’s son’s grave at Arlington National Cemetery in 2017, Trump asked Kelly “what was in it for them?”

Advertisement

The story, which is based on the “anonymous sources” that were so prevalent during Trump’s tenure, immediately became riddled with holes. Jeffrey Goldberg, editor in chief of The Atlantic, then claimed the sources would remain anonymous, basically because he didn’t want to subject people to mean tweets from Trump.

Well, this Memorial Day, Goldberg is re-upping the uber-dubious story:

Considering how many of the media’s “sources” were discredited these past few years (along with the media debunking things Trump said that turned out to be factual or possibly true), the story remains to be taken with less than a grain of salt:

Well, they probably got a few more Resistance clicks, and it wouldn’t be surprising if CNN and/or MSNBC give the story fresh life today.

Advertisement

Sounds totally legit! *Eye roll*

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement