During the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings, Democrat Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse spent a great deal of time doing a forensic analysis of one of his yearbooks. Now Whitehouse has some different paper to go through, and it apparently started with Chief Justice John Roberts’ rebuke of Sen. Chuck Schumer after his unhinged rant outside the Supreme Court:
Where was neutral umpire Roberts when President Trump targeted two women on the Court? Give me a break. https://t.co/3GYpIDmCEn
— Sheldon Whitehouse (@SenWhitehouse) March 5, 2020
Remind me what Roberts had to say when Kavanaugh had his wildly inappropriate rant in the Judiciary Committee? Where was his outrage then? Some neutral umpire.
— Sheldon Whitehouse (@SenWhitehouse) March 5, 2020
And Whitehouse’s office killed some trees to try and make a point:
These are the 80 partisan, 5-4 Supreme Court decisions favoring big Republican donor interests since John Roberts became chief justice in 2005. pic.twitter.com/lVb6QyBz6x
— Sheldon Whitehouse (@SenWhitehouse) March 6, 2020
Recommended
80 partisan, 5-4 Supreme Court decisions favoring big Republican donor interests stacked up.
80 is a lot of cases. pic.twitter.com/ep86Hg2LRX
— Sheldon Whitehouse (@SenWhitehouse) March 6, 2020
Is that the senator’s way of trying to say Schumer was right to threaten a couple of SCOTUS justices?
Another day, another misleading attack on the Court’s credibility from Democratic senators… https://t.co/DYgnPARET8
— James Hasson (@JamesHasson20) March 6, 2020
Partisan = I don't like the ruling https://t.co/hYYWRKbCig
— Jason Howerton (@jason_howerton) March 6, 2020
Bingo!
Excellent legal analysis Sheldon. "Here's a stack of papers and people I dislike won these cases." https://t.co/Dedm4Oy5gW
— Mo Mo (@molratty) March 6, 2020
Hope you get through this bro. Use each page as a tissue for your tears. https://t.co/rGvFvbUZhr
— Caleb Hull (@CalebJHull) March 6, 2020
Stick to arguing over the definition of “boofing”, genius. https://t.co/tGOe3rA8df
— BT (@back_ttys) March 6, 2020
"80 things I don't like and have zero control over." https://t.co/7hLQmpPQqI
— Romantic About Baseball (@sierradeltaxd) March 6, 2020
I’ll bet that they actually favor the Constitution.
— neverleft (@neverbeenleft) March 6, 2020
Thanks for wasting all that paper for a Twitter pic. Some environmentalist you are.
— Forum Non (@ForumNon) March 6, 2020
Whitehouse should understand what’s happening if he paid attention to the previous president:
'Elections have consequences' – Barack Obama, 2009
— Unlikely (@UnlikelyLikable) March 6, 2020
