Here’s a story for our VIP members where that acronym could also stand for Very Ironic Post: In Florida, a pregnant mother used an AR-15 to defend her family against two intruders. One intruder fled, but the other was killed. The New York Post was among media outlets reporting the story:
Pregnant Florida mom uses AR-15 to kill home intruder https://t.co/8HgLQejaw6 pic.twitter.com/zGpFkQE8d5
— New York Post (@nypost) November 4, 2019
Bearing Arms’ editor, Cam Edwards, alerted the Post to what its editorial board said not more than three months ago:
This would be the gun your editorial board wants to ban, @nypost. https://t.co/ChG3kvs9Lz
— Cam Edwards (@CamEdwards) November 4, 2019
Well, look at that! Back in August, the New York Post editorial board published an editorial saying that it’s time for “assault weapons” to go, including AR-15s:
Recommended
New York Post: “Gun control works.” https://t.co/fjeAExbIRs
— Lisa Fleisher (@lisafleisher) August 5, 2019
NY Post calls for new assault weapons ban of semi-autos like AR-15s, but admits it doesn’t work. (Duh.)They call for ban in firepower, instead of usual cosmetic features. (Bans on either don’t work.) Journos must start objectively covering guns.Urgently. https://t.co/9rBJFs9KqE pic.twitter.com/aHvjU8YvoU
— Gabriella Hoffman (@Gabby_Hoffman) August 5, 2019
Does the Post see it?
— LTW3 (@LeeTggra) November 4, 2019
Gun rights are women's rights.
— GunLover (@GunLoveBlog) November 4, 2019
This is why we have the 2nd amendment…. Protection!
The police could not have stopped this. No gov agency was there to help.
Your rights ensure you can protect yourself!
This woman is a hero for doing whatever it took to protect her family. #patriotwarriors https://t.co/mtnREjiHd5
— Brian Thomsen (@brianlthomsen) November 4, 2019
