WHOOPS! NY Times accidentally drops narrative-busting bomb on the Dems' voter ID talking points

There’s a controversial voter ID law in North Dakota, and the New York Times reports that the voters have spoken:

Galvanized by a voter ID law, Native Americans turned out in record numbers in North Dakota — and a Native American woman unseated the law's architect https://t.co/O6gZq5Jbm0

— NYT Politics (@nytpolitics) November 14, 2018

For many, there’s a Democrat talking point in that headline that got shredded:

So clearly the Voter ID law wasn't suppressing their vote.

— Sgt. K. Onyx (@SgtKOnyx) November 14, 2018

So Voter ID did not "suppress the vote" in North Dakota. Thank you. https://t.co/m8HI1dtJTW

— Sister Toldjah ? (@sistertoldjah) November 14, 2018

Yes, thanks a lot, NY Times!

So it did not suppress voting https://t.co/sxLW4S3wgN

— Kurt Schlichter (@KurtSchlichter) November 14, 2018

I thought voter ID laws suppressed votes… https://t.co/zJYZ7eNioi

— Doctor ?? (@drhampel1) November 14, 2018

So Voter ID laws didn't suppress their votes? The media coverage was a lie and it worked for the Democrats? Shocker. https://t.co/hkBMAw4knZ

— Dale Jackson (@TheDaleJackson) November 14, 2018

Wait, so they voted to overturn a Voter ID law they believed suppressed their vote and won? ? https://t.co/qWtRlErHwP

— Chad Felix Greene (@chadfelixg) November 14, 2018

Recommended

Former Federal Employee Spills ALL THE BEANS on What's REALLY Going on with Fed Employees and Wow (Watch)

Sam J.

Advertisement

But guess what point won’t be taken…

They'll never learn that lesson from that data.

— Pradheep J. Shanker, M.D., M.S. (@Neoavatara) November 14, 2018

Was not mentioned once in the article.

— Sister Toldjah ? (@sistertoldjah) November 14, 2018

And call attention to a Democrat talking point that got shot down in the same story? Never!