Here's JD Vance Casting the Deciding Vote to Confirm America's Next Secretary of...
America First: Rubio Initiates 90 Day Review Of All Foreign Aid as Ordered...
'SMACKDOWN ALERT'! Trump LEVELED L.A. Mayor Bass (and Others) in Meeting After Touring...
Jeffries Wonders Why Donald Trump Hasn't Magically Cleaned Up Democratic Chaos in Just...
Gesture Jester: Gavin Newsom Impersonator Hilariously Has Us Seeing Double
Men Make the Best Actresses, Just Ask the Academy Awards
Law and Border: President Trump Using Centuries-Old Statutes in Fight Against Illegal Immi...
It's the Circle of Life! Company That Started Corporate Woke Nonsense Pulls the...
Day Two: DeSantis' Team Schools Media on Shocking Concept ... Words Mean Things
WATCH: Donald Trump Turns Over Mic to North Carolinians STILL Suffering From Hurricane...
UPDATED: Rumor Circulating Senator Thom Tillis is a 'NO' on Hegseth Possibly Sinking...
Not HIS Problem: Gavin Newsom Blames Trump for Pointing Out California's Self-Inflicted Wa...
More Winning: Trump Administration Shuts Down Biden's Fake 'Banned Books' Investigations
Follow the Money: RandoLand Exposes Why Catholic Bishops REALLY Oppose Trump's Immigration...
Case Dropped Against Whistleblowing Doctor Who Exposed Texas Hospital Performing Child Sex...

D'oh! Vox has major buzzkill for Dems (Hint: ANOTHER talking point bites the dust?)

For years the Democrats have been fighting against voter ID laws for a whole variety of alleged reasons, but even Vox had to temper some of the attempts to manufacture outrage:

Advertisement

This story so close on the heels to the Rachel Maddow backfire has got to only add to the lefty disappointment:

It was supposed to be the study that proved voter ID laws are not just discriminatory but can also have a big impact on elections. And it was picked up widely, with outlets including ThinkProgress and the Washington Post reporting that the study found voter ID laws hurt Hispanic voters in particular and skewed elections to the right.

But a follow-up study suggests the findings in the original were bunk. According to researchers at Stanford, Yale, and the University of Pennsylvania, the original study was based on surveys of voters that are extremely unreliable — skewing the results. On top of that, several calculation errors led to even more problems. When the errors are corrected, the follow-up researchers found, there’s no evidence in the analyzed data that voter ID laws have a statistically significant impact on voter turnout.

Advertisement

Shocker!

https://twitter.com/JammieWF/status/842030183074881536
https://twitter.com/Moj_kobe/status/842030911403126784


https://twitter.com/Rschrim/status/841991177981300737

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement