WATCH: Adam Schiff-for-Brains Lies About California Reservoirs (and John Karl Doesn't Fact...
Associated PROPAGANDA: AP Gets SMACKED Down for Blaming 'Wild Weather Week' on Climate...
Dressed to Steal: Looter Cosplaying as Firefighter Arrested While Wildfires Destroy Homes...
Blame Game: You'll Never Guess Who Maxine Waters Says Is Responsible for L.A....
Nero Newsom’s California Burns as MSNBC’s Jen Psaki Aims Democrat Blame-Thrower at Trump...
Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso: 'Our Goal — to Get His Team in...
'You Are Stunningly Bad at This Job': Justine Bateman Calls Out Karen Bass'...
‘I’m Somebody’s Son, Also!’ Michael Cohen Pleads for Preemptive Pardon Just Like Hunter...
'Dem Incompetence at Work'! NY Gov. Hochul Still Pushing the Most Counterproductive Idea...
Rush Limbaugh Would Have Been 74 Today. David Limbaugh and Erick Erickson Reflect.
Brian Stelter Bemoans Facebook's 'Fact Checker' Dismissal
Where’s the Dam Water? JD Vance Goes After Gavin Newsom for California’s Dry...
Biden WH Spending Last Days Trying to Shatter All Economic Gaslighting Records
Greg Gutfeld Serves Lincoln Project a Nice REFRESHING Glass of STFU Juice for...
Someone Should Ask Kamala Harris If She Still Wants to Defund the Police...

'Make it stop!' Michelle Malkin pounds EPA for unwelcome response to river contamination

Officials from the Environmental Protection Agency are in Colorado and New Mexico to assess the fallout from one of their clean up efforts that went terribly awry.

Advertisement

The EPA’s mission is to regulate, and that “higher standard” part should keep us laughing for a while.

And get this one:

Let “science” be their guide? Just in case they might use some of the same “science” that triggered the disaster, many, including Michelle Malkin, are telling the EPA “thanks but no thanks,” just not in those words:

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement