Trolling Trump: President-Elect Sends Sarcastic ‘Season’s Greetings’ to Those on His Naugh...
What the Puck? Trump Suggests NHL Superstar Wayne Gretzky Replace Justin Trudeau
Church of England Warns Clergy About Christmas Carols With 'Problematic Words'
Matt Yglesias: Why Aren't Conservatives Bothered by Crime in Conservative States?
Taylor Lorenz Extremely Stressed About Getting a Rush Visa ASAP
People Have Fun With Idea That 'Hunnikah' Celebrates a Jewish Gorilla War
Christmas Is a Miracle and You Don't Need to Look Further Than North...
Happy Holidays Tweet from the ATF Doesn't Warm The Heart
If What the Teamsters Prez Told Tucker Carlson Is True It's No Wonder...
Merry Christmas: A Special Bonus Gift of Christmas Funnies Just for You
Simply ‘Wonderful’: Classic Holiday Film Reminds Generations It’s Okay to Cry at Christmas
A Lump of Coal in Her Stocking! Crypto Influencer Gets BURIED for Not...
Political Pivot? Many Question ‘Young Turk’ Cenk Uygur’s Sudden Willingness to Talk with...
'The View' Panelist Says Problem for Dems Is That Gov't Won't Regulate Social...
Man Vs. History: Bear Grylls Gets DROPPED by Community Notes for Awful Take...

'Just a lie’: Vox slammed for claiming Clarence Thomas said slavery was 'just fine for human dignity'

Advertisement

Here’s a portion of what Thomas wrote in his dissenting opinion in the Supreme Court’s ruling on same-sex marriage:

The corollary of that principle is that human dignity cannot be taken away by the government. Slaves did not lose their dignity (any more than they lost their humanity) because the government allowed them to be enslaved. Those held in internment camps did not lose their dignity because the government confined them. And those denied governmental benefits certainly do not lose their dignity because the government denies them those benefits. The government cannot bestow dignity, and it cannot take it away.”

A Voxsplainer summed it up this way:

Yes, you read that correctly. He said that slavery did not have any impact on enslaved people’s dignity.

They left out a key component, didn’t they?

The tweet was even more disingenuous:

Thomas said slavery was among things that were “just fine for human dignity”?

That of course is not what Thomas wrote, but it didn’t matter by then because Vox had already further successfully perpetuated the Left’s narrative about Clarence Thomas:

Advertisement


https://twitter.com/ravenhawkeyes/status/614682428175552512

https://twitter.com/clintspringer/status/614678691600310272
https://twitter.com/NussCoug/status/614666801335529472
https://twitter.com/TAEWOONSUS/status/614664625209085952
https://twitter.com/LarryMcVA/status/614698147994927104
https://twitter.com/aliciafiasco_/status/614666230826299392
https://twitter.com/JQWhiskeyGinger/status/614826694076182528

Meanwhile, those who actually read what Thomas wrote saw it differently:

Thomas wrote that government cannot bestow or take away human dignity, but Vox ignored that to try and score some cheap points.


https://twitter.com/stevengo99/status/614820616001204224

Advertisement

They’re too busy Vox-splaining the world to everybody.

(hat tip: @WFBfan)

***

Related:

How tolerant! ‘Dr. Vox’ rails against ‘the most barbaric, bigoted’ American South

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement