Puh-LEEZE! Several Dems on CNN Act Like They're Just Now Learning Biden Wasn't...
Ex DHS Secretary Mayorkas for SOME Reason Ran Away From Questions About the...
Oh, Honey: Obama Asks 'What If I Did This?' and X Reminds Him...
James Carville Says Businesses and Law Firms that Work with Trump Remind Him...
Tesla Dealerships Brace for Weekend of Protests, Violence, and Possible Domestic Terrorism
CNN Complains That Bombing Yemen is Too Expensive, Trump Disagrees and BOOM! Go...
The GOP Must Act to Permanently Protect Women From Trans Ideology
Mayoral Candidate Pushes Poll That 'Proves' NYC Residents Really Want Government-Run Groce...
SHADOW GOVERNMENT: DNC Chair Martin Announces Unelected 'People's Cabinet' of Experts to '...
The Left's War on Women Continues As Montana Judge Blocks Bathroom Bill With...
Inverse Cramer Never Fails! Always Wrong CNBC Host Is BIG MAD About Trump...
Biased Media Clowns Chime In on Transgender Fencing Brouhaha With Incredibly Sexist Headli...
Hello Logan Act! Gavin Newsom Tells Nation's California's 'Ready to Talk' Amid Trump...
Elie Mystal Continues His Insanity Calling to Replace Our Constitution Like They Did...
NC Court Rules 65K Voters Have Fifteen Days to Prove Eligibility In Contested...

Eleanor Holmes Norton brings the funny: 'Objective' NYT vindicates White House and Susan Rice

Over the weekend, a lengthy report in the New York Times concluded that the attack in Benghazi was largely caused by anger over a controversial YouTube video, and also that Al Qaeda was not involved in the attack. After the NYT report was published, Darrell Issa, along with a Democrat congressman, both said that intelligence does indicate Al Qaeda involvement in the attack. Issa also contended that he’s seen no evidence indicating that anger about the YouTube video provided the spark for the attack.

Advertisement

Not so fast on calling “case closed” just because the “objective” NYT said so.

https://twitter.com/Shaughn_A/status/417768423586664450

https://twitter.com/MarineReconDad/status/417777866537844736

https://twitter.com/hwb120240/status/417782052101292032

If New York Times reports are infallible on the facts then why even bother having congressional committee investigations?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement