Politico: Federal Employees Are Sweating a Trump Comeback
Kamala Harris Tells Charlamagne tha God There's No Question Reparations Have to Be...
'You Have Lost Your Damn Mind' - Harris Campaign's Desperate Play for Black...
NYT: Donald Trump Spreads His Politics of Grievance to Nonwhite Voters
Bret Baier Should Ask Kamala Harris These Three Questions
Dana Loesch Destroys Tim Walz’s Elmer Fudd Hunting Photo Op
Kamala's Husband Offers a Really Strange Glimpse into Their Very Weird Marriage
WATCH: Tim Walz Makes an Absolute KNUCKLEHEAD of Himself Trying to Dunk on...
CNN: Kamala Harris Said She Might Prosecute Oil Companies for Climate Change
Joe Biden's Cognitive Health Is a Beam in the Left's Eye
One Tweet to Rule Them All! Zeek Arkham Destroys the Kamala Harris Agenda...
Golden Arch Rivals: Donald McDonald to One-Up the Kamburglar
Opportunity Economy: Walgreens to Close 1,200 Locations, Saying 25 Percent of Stores Are...
Michigan Senate Candidate Says Gun Violence Is Top Killer of ‘Children Under 21’
Leftists Who HATE 'Mansplaining' Are Very Quiet About Two MEN Facing Off in...
Premium

You Are on the Wrong Side of History. Artificial Diversity Under Enforcement of Law is Not Diversity

AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

Anyone who has paid attention over the last decade has figured out that when the left says, 'diversity,' they are not talking about an organic gathering of unique perspectives. Diversity is frequently just another term for race quotas and discrimination.

When it comes to LGBTQ though, the absurdity is even worse. 'Diversity,' really just means, 'agree with them on everything about sexuality and gender.'

The UK-based account boasts of inclusion and representation, but X users couldn't help but notice the narrow scope of their declaration. The 'days of us all being the same are long gone?' What?

Interesting statement from a movement that demands absolute ideological conformity and strict identity categories.

For leftwing activists, diversity means the room has an arbitrarily sufficient number of preferred minorities in it. They count each group using sophisticated algorithms to ensure maximum representation and differences, as long as everyone is basically the same.

You won't find any conservatives in the bunch!

I always notice the loudest activists for being different always look exactly the same, (see that hideous nose ring they all wear).

More than that, though, they insist on everything thinking the same. To the point they've made public disagreement with LGBTQ-dictated reality a criminal offense.

A new law in Scotland, for example, does just that.

'There is concern that the new measures could be used maliciously against certain groups for expressing their opinions, in particular gender-critical feminists.

The SNP MP Joanna Cherry has said she has no doubt that the new law “will be weaponised by trans rights activists to try to silence, and worse still criminalise, women who do not share their beliefs”.

Some people who disagree with the gender-critical stance of the author and activist JK Rowling have already threatened to lodge complaints about her with Police Scotland from 1 April.'

What they want, of course, is to express themselves without criticism. They aren't concerned about your feelings or rights. Preferred minorities, like LGBTQ, are characterized as requiring 'protections' from public criticism based entirely on the idea that any questioning of their identities or ideology is considered harmful.

Questioning your identity or your ideology is not harmful. It's actually justice or something.

'Diversity will grow,' to them, means more and more LGBTQ identities being publicly recognized and protected. Ironically, diversity in principle requires a range of people from various backgrounds, which include those the left want to shame out of public life.

They mean, 'more of us,' not a good balance of everyone.

Everyone is already unique and different and interesting. We all bring perspectives that add to the conversation. The left only sees skin color and outward expressions of identity. They see groups rather than individuals. While they imagine they are championing a world where everyone feels included, all they are really doing is exclusively boxing people into strict social groups.

As long as they get to be the ones deciding who is in and who is out, they're happy.

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement