NH Teacher Union Head Says the Quiet Part Out Loud As She Rails...
WATCH: The New Naked Gun Trailer Drops With the PERFECT O.J. Simpson Joke
Flashback: Here's Nancy Pelosi Singing a (D)ifferent Tune on China, Trade Deficits, and...
‘Hmmm’: Adam Kinzinger Suspicious There Are No Tariffs on Russia
What a Peach! Watch Unhinged Leftist Crow About 'No FEMA' for Tornado-Impacted Red...
Tim Walz's Magical Media Tour Continues! He Tells MSNBC Voters Regret Electing Trump...
Not Even CLOSE, Bud! The Hill Wants Us to Believe the Pendulum Is...
Only 19% of Baltimore Kids Are Proficient in Math, So the District Spends...
Jamie Raskin Calls Fed. Employees Patriots, Claims They Pass Up MANY Rich Jobs...
U.S. Bans Romantic Relationships Between Gov Workers and Chinese Citizens, Eric Swalwell H...
EPIC Post from GenZ'r Explaining Why He's NOT Worried About His 401K DECIMATES...
Now That the Border Is Secure It's Safe for Dems to Go (Tom...
NBC News Scrapes the Bottom of the Barrel to Get a Nurse's Opinion...
CNN's Abby Phillip Gets Fact Checked to Her Face!
HORSES**T! Stephanie Ruhle Tries Lecturing MAGA About What THEY Voted for but Dean...

'Isn't That Illegal?' Buzz Patterson Exposes CA Rep Eric Swalwell Apparently Breaking 'No Block' Rule

AP Photo/Elise Amendola

We all know Democrats don't play by the rules, even when they created said rules in the first place. 

Advertisement

Let's take a trip back to 2017 when Trump was sued for blocking critics on Twitter, now X. The lawsuit said, '...the @realDonaldTrump account is a “public forum” under the First Amendment, from which the government may not exclude people based simply on their views.'

Then AOC found herself sued after blocking users, 'Trump is not allowed to block people, will the standards apply equally? Stay tuned to find out!'

'Blocking people on social media — esp as women, typically subjected to an avalanche of hateful and misogynistic speech online — is not a violation of their First Amendment rights," said state Sen. Julia Salazar, D-Brooklyn. "None of us have a constitutional right to use someone's Twitter to abuse them.'

Funny how that works when Trump did it.

Anyway, after a few years of back and forth court battling, the Supreme Court finally announced in March that government officials can't block users, well sometimes. It depends.

One might argue that politicians should err on the side of caution, ignore their egos and make choices that benefit everyone, even if they don't like it themselves.

But we're talking about Eric Swalwell here.

Advertisement

Oh, like Swalwell cares about 'breaking the law.'

Please.

You see, the problem here is the citizen must take action against the official in order for the courts to force said official to follow the rules.

Democrats know the average person isn't going to, or can't, take such a lengthy and expensive action. So, they just do what they want, knowing enforcement is more burdensome than ignoring their violations.

Advertisement

Well, except for Buzz Patterson.

Oof.

Maybe Swalwell will finally have to experience some professional consequences for his actions for once!

Can you imagine such a thing?

Can't wait to see what happens! STAY TUNED!

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement