MSNBC Learned NOTHING from the Election and Will Lean Into 'Progressive Roots' While...
Hell YES! Intelligence Community Insider Spills the TEA on Just How SCARED They...
Brian Stelter Says What Trump and DOGE Are Doing SOUNDS Like Common Sense...
Guess Who's Writing for The Bulwark NOW! Queen CENSORSHIP Herself ...
HA! Sec. Sean Duffy Shows Whiny Fed Employees How It's DONE, Sends 5...
ME-OWWW! Keith Olbermann Going Full Blown Race-Baiter About MSNBC Firing Joy Reid Annoys...
Politico Reports Liberals Are Fearful the FBI Will Be Politicized With Patel and...
FOIA Requested Video Shows That Thing Democrats SWEAR Doesn't Happen With Trans HAPPENED...
This Warning About Firing Federal Workers Isn't the Indictment of Trump and DOGE...
WOOF! Jonah Goldberg's Terrible, No Good, VERY BAD Week Gets WORSE as Old...
As a Reminder, Here's How a Federal Employee Reacted to Pipeline Workers Biden...
'Nervous?' Adam Schiff's Not Handling the Dan Bongino FBI News Very Well (Maybe...
Legal Analyst Leaves MSNBC Panel SPEECHLESS Pointing Out Trump Isn't Losing Legal Battles...
THIS! MERCILESS Thread NAILS It Explaining Why SO Many Americans Are Cheering Fed...
Former WH Spox Who Assured Us Biden Was Fine and Running Wants to...

NBC News Reports on 1868 Ruling That Could Keep Donald Trump From Serving Again

@WhiteTallon

NBC News just put this up today, although it's been talked about for years now online. In case you didn't know, the 14th Amendment disqualifies those who "engaged in insurrection" from serving again. How will this affect Donald Trump? Several states are trying to remove him from the ballot saying he's not eligible to run, even though he hasn't even been charged with, let alone convicted of, insurrection.

Advertisement

NBC News get everyone who's been asleep since Trump announced his candidacy up to date:

[Chief Justice Salmon] Chase’s [1868] rulings have taken on new relevance as the Supreme Court hears Trump’s plea that he not be removed from the Republican primary ballot in Colorado. He is seeking to throw out a Colorado Supreme Court ruling that said he is ineligible under Section 3 because of his role in seeking to overturn the 2020 presidential election results in a series of events that led to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol.

“I don’t know that any one case or any one justice from the past is going to be the dominant kind of theme or a talisman that the court looks at,” said Vikram Amar, a professor at the University of California Davis School of Law, who filed a brief that mentions Chase’s rulings.

This time around, Chase ruled that “legislation by Congress is necessary” for someone to be disqualified under the 14th Amendment, in part because of the far-reaching consequences of invalidating thousands of decisions made by officials with similar Confederate backgrounds to the judge in Griffin’s case.

Advertisement

Before getting into the tall grass, prove to us that there was an "insurrection" at all. If it were Democrats, January 6 would have been called a "mostly peaceful protest."

Advertisement

NBC News notes that "the history is relevant in part because several members of the conservative-majority Supreme Court put considerable weight on how people would have understood constitutional provisions at the time they were written."

This is wish-casting. Trump will be on the ballot, and if he's not, Joe Biden will disappear from a lot of state ballots.

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.  Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement