Justice for Trooper: DeSantis Presses Charges Against Man Who Abandoned Dog to Hurricane...
Politico: Federal Employees Are Sweating a Trump Comeback
Kamala Harris Tells Charlamagne tha God There's No Question Reparations Have to Be...
'You Have Lost Your Damn Mind' - Harris Campaign's Desperate Play for Black...
NYT: Donald Trump Spreads His Politics of Grievance to Nonwhite Voters
Bret Baier Should Ask Kamala Harris These Three Questions
Dana Loesch Destroys Tim Walz’s Elmer Fudd Hunting Photo Op
Kamala's Husband Offers a Really Strange Glimpse into Their Very Weird Marriage
WATCH: Tim Walz Makes an Absolute KNUCKLEHEAD of Himself Trying to Dunk on...
CNN: Kamala Harris Said She Might Prosecute Oil Companies for Climate Change
Joe Biden's Cognitive Health Is a Beam in the Left's Eye
One Tweet to Rule Them All! Zeek Arkham Destroys the Kamala Harris Agenda...
Golden Arch Rivals: Donald McDonald to One-Up the Kamburglar
Opportunity Economy: Walgreens to Close 1,200 Locations, Saying 25 Percent of Stores Are...
Michigan Senate Candidate Says Gun Violence Is Top Killer of ‘Children Under 21’

MSNBC editor 'troubled' that Carnegie Mellon would disavow that heinous tweet by one of its professors

Now that Queen Elizabeth II has passed away, takes on British colonization (or even its brutal and bloody decolonization) are a dime a dozen. But it took someone special to come up with a take so heinous that Twitter removed it. Carnegie Mellon’s Uju Anya tweeted, “I heard the chief monarch of a thieving raping genocidal empire is finally dying. May her pain be excruciating.” Carnegie Mellon put out a statement saying Anya’s words did not reflect the value of the institution — pretty weak — but an editor at MSNBC found it “troubling” that the university might not want to be tainted by such an awful tweet.

Advertisement

Zeeshan Aleem writes:

Universities almost never issue statements like this because the very premise of a university is to serve as a bastion of independent thinking and provide a forum for intellectual free-for-alls. A university would never be presumed to endorse any of its scholars’ individual beliefs, which is key for academia as a space for provocation to thrive. So in effect, this statement was a condemnation and implicitly a signal to other academics at the university that they should watch their mouth on certain matters. While the motivation behind the unusual statement is unclear, it underscores how vulnerable public intellectuals are to controversy-driven social media pile-ons.

Cutting her loose would have been a signal to other academics to watch their mouths.

Advertisement

And the queen was supposedly setting foreign policy at the time?

Advertisement

We’re guessing she has tenure and can fully indulge in her mental health issues.

***

Editor’s Note:
 
Help us keep owning the libs! Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code AMERICAFIRST to receive a 25% discount off your membership!

Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement