Federal Workers Shocked to Learn They're Not Royalty and Forced by Trump to...
Eight More Years! President Trump Trolls Media by Hinting He’s Ready to Serve...
He’s Everywhere! ‘Journalists’ Lament Energetic, Omnipresent Trump After Boring Biden’s Ca...
‘Hatch’ Act: Elie Mystal Goes on Race Rant Blaming White People for Trump...
Remaining Red: Florida Republicans Celebrate Nikki Fried’s Democrat Party Chair Victory
Stand-Up Guy: Trump Creates Comedy Skit Out of Sleepy Joe Biden’s Inability to...
Maddow in Tears! Trump Predicts the Demise of ‘Enemy of the People’ MSNBC...
Brit Goes Undercover With the Far-Right Patriotic Alternative for BBC
America’s Golden Age: White House Releases List of Trump’s Actions Over His First...
Here’s a Peek at Anthony Fauci’s Old Taxpayer-Funded Security
President Donald Trump Announces We Are Now in a Merit-Based World
The Left's Warped View of Women Is Bound to Backfire
'USA! USA!' Trump Hit a Vegas Casino and What Happened Next Is a...
Historian Amazed by How Well Fed and Looked After Released Hamas Hostages Appear
Following Pete Hegseth's Confirmation, Media Double Down on Former Sister-in-Law's Debunke...

NBC News' fact-check of Ketanji Brown Jackson's 'twisted' record notes it's 'not a radical view' that some child-sex offenders may have nonsexual motivations

All eyes are on Sen. Josh Hawley during the confirmation hearings for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson and “we should all prepare for his funeral tomorrow.” Hawley made waves with a Twitter thread “cherry-picking” from Jackson’s record and speeches and suggesting she might be soft on sexual offenders where children are involved. Hawley’s sticking by his thread with a retweet of the Washington Examiner.

Advertisement

We’re not sure if this fact-check was done by NBC News and picked up by NBC Chicago or if NBC Chicago did it, but either way, Will Weissert and Calvin Woodward make it clear that Republicans are “twisting” Jackson’s record.

So? What about Hawley’s claim that Jackson has sentenced child sex offenders to sentences shorter than the suggested minimum guidelines? Our fact-checkers write:

She told the [sentencing] hearing she was surprised at a Justice Department expert’s testimony that, as she put it, some child-sex offenders may actually “not be pedophiles” but perhaps “loners” looking for like-minded company in child pornography circles. Being surprised by an assertion and wanting to know more are not the same as endorsing it.

From those questions, Hawley extrapolated that Jackson had drawn conclusions, when she hadn’t.

But several behavioral science researchers testified at that hearing that there may be nonsexual motivations among a portion of child-sex criminals. It is not a radical view. And many judges do see a distinction between those who produce child pornography and those who receive it.

It’s not a radical view among some researchers that pedophilia isn’t a crime but just another misunderstood sexual orientation. Salon was blasted last fall for “trying to mainstream pedophilia” in an article titled, “I’m a pedophile, but not a monster.” Just this January, USA Today wrote that “there’s a lot we’re misunderstanding” about pedophilia. Slate pondered if pedophilia was a crime to be punished. We note that the New York Times has deleted its repugnant headline about pedophilia. Into the memory hole it goes, along with Salon’s articles.

Advertisement

So yeah, maybe she was just asking questions. That still doesn’t explain the under-sentencing of sex offenders noted in Hawley’s thread. Is it really so wrong for senators to want to clarify a Supreme Court nominee’s thinking on the issue?

Advertisement

It really isn’t a fact-check at all. Take the specific cases Hawley cited, and then “fact-check” whether or not Jackson was lenient in her sentencing.


Related:

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement