BASED: Stephen Miller Gives MASTER CLASS in How to Handle Media Answering Questions...
Wanna See Just How DUMB the Left REALLY Is? Check Out This Obviously...
David Axelrod Not a Fan of Dr. Phil Drawing Extra Attention to Biden...
Let's GOOOOO! Kurt Schlichter's Kick-A*S 'To-Do List' for Pete Hegseth Will TOTALLY Break...
Former Federal Employee Spills ALL THE BEANS on What's REALLY Going on with...
White House Thread Spotlights Some 'Model Citizens' (According to Biden) ICE Has Arrested...
Here We GO! Pete Hegseth Makes EPIC Speech After Arriving at Pentagon and...
WOMP-Womp! NBC Journo Learns the HARD WAY That Bleeding Heart BS Does NOT...
SAVAGE Meme of LOOKS Margaret Brennan Made During JD Vance Interview Shows How...
Snakes in the Grass: The Left Tries to Sabotage Pete Hegseth With Ginned-Up...
With the U.K. Calling for His Head, Elon Musk Offers HILARIOUS New Name...
Monday Morning Meme Madness
X User Loser: Colombia President Reposts His ‘L’ on Social Media and Quickly...
FAFO Diplomacy: Scott Jennings Explains How Colombia F’d Around with Trump and Found...
Large Group Terrorizes Drivers Blocking Streets in Dallas While Demanding Open Border with...

Sen. Mazie Hirono to originalist court nominee: 'You would not allow women and blacks to vote'

Trump judicial nominee Lawrence VanDyke is an originalist and said in a hearing Wednesday that he would “look to the Constitution” when considering whether laws were constitutional. This apparently set off alarm bells for Sen. Mazie Hirono, who seemed to assume that as an originalist, VanDyke would only look to the Constitution before it was amended.

Advertisement

That’s some gotcha. Alex Griswold reports in the Washington Free Beacon:

Sen. Mazie Hirono (D., Hawaii) attacked a judicial nominee Wednesday, charging that he would rule against suffrage for blacks and women if a hypothetical U.S. Constitution banned them from voting.

Hirono took issue with Trump judicial nominee Lawrence VanDyke’s statement that he would “look to the Constitution” when considering whether laws were constitutional. She said during a Judiciary Committee hearing such an approach would threaten the voting rights of minorities and women if the Constitution had not already been changed to ensure voting rights for minorities and women.

… “the point I’m making, of course, which you’re trying to get around, is that originalism means that you would interpret Constitution at the time of its enactment, and you would not allow women and blacks to vote because that was not in the Constitution when it was ratified in 1789,” Hirono said.

Advertisement

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement