Taylor Lorenz FLIPS OUT in Back and Forth When Nate Silver Dares Point...
We'd PAY to See That! Geraldo Rivera BRAGS That He'd 'Square Off' with...
'LAUGHS in Wingman': Joyce Alene Accidentally NUKES Obama Making Smug Dig at Trump...
X Mourns As TV Legend, Conservative Patriot (and Twitchy Fave) Chuck Woolery Passes...
Joe Rogan Explaining HOW He'll Take Over Rachel Maddow's Show IF Elon Musk...
MSNBC's Kyle Griffin Trying to Pretend Trump's Win Wasn't ACTUALLY a Big Deal...
Rachel Maddow Crying Over Elon Musk Meme Parody Fools EVEN Us ... But...
Meal Breaker? Woman Asks if Trump Flag Should Come Down for Democrat Thanksgiving...
NYT: Automakers Want Trump to Keep Biden EV Mandates in Place
No Experience Necessary: Kamala HQ TikTok Team Was Nothing But Gen Zers
Girl Allegedly Sexually Assaulted by Venezuelan Illegal Living in Family's Basement
Did Pam Bondi Really Steal a St. Bernard? Journalism Has Gone to the...
MSNBC Contributor Asks If We Want Someone Who Made Terror Watch List as...
ABC News Tell You How to Join Bluesky
Will 'Journos' Ever Learn?: X is the Mainstream, Not The Atlantic and Other...

Kirsten Gillibrand only this weekend crossed the 65,000-donor threshold to get her on the debate stage

As Twitchy has reported earlier, to qualify for a spot on the already crowded Democrat primary debate stage, you either have to place somewhere in three specific polls or show that you have amassed 65,000 unique donors to your campaign. As someone who consistently polls at 0 percent, Gillibrand was counting on the donors to get her over the threshold. (It’s also why we suspect Eric Swalwell keeps posting videos begging for one dollar.)

Advertisement

And … drum roll, please … Gillibrand finally managed to con 65,000 people into donating money to her campaign, although we don’t know how many kicked in a buck just to see her on the debate stage for a laugh.

Congratulations and on to the next step in your national humiliation:

Remember, she’s never lost a race, so President Gillibrand is an inevitability.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Exactly: we want to see 24 people up on that debate stage all at once, each pushing the others further left.

Your move, Swalwell.


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos