Rachel Maddow Shows There Are Convenient Exceptions to ‘No One Is Above the...
‘Dying’ for Attention: Protesters Unleash the Undeniable Power of Passively Lying on the...
No Need to Hire a Comedian When AP ‘Journalist’ Unintentionally Provides Biggest Laugh...
Andrew McCabe Says Case Against Judge Hannah Dugan is Solid but Arrest Was...
Rachel Maddow and Jamie Raskin Reveal the Dem Party’s New DEI - Dramatic...
Scott Jennings Schools CNN Panelists on why President AOC Would Be a Nightmare...
Another Night Surrounded by Democrats, Scott Jennings Attends the White House Corresponden...
Ontario Must Pay for Man to Have a Vagina Constructed While Leaving His...
Social Worker Has Absolute Meltdown Over Student Loans
Democrats Keep Proving Me Right (and I Hate It)
County Attorney Requiring Prosecutors to Consider Race When Offering Plea Deals
Hello, Gaslight! Democrat Jason Crow Earns EPIC Ratio for Lying About What His...
Susan Rice Goes on a Rant About White Male Christian Cisgender Macho MAGA...
J.K. Rowling Wants THIS Video Saved for Future Generations to See How Stupid...
Conor McGregor Expresses His Support for Irish Marchers Against Mass Immigration

New Yorker critic discovers that the 'Gosnell' movie is 'transparently racist, repulsive' pro-life propaganda

Journalists were happy to see the movie “Gosnell” slip out of view, but then something happened that they couldn’t ignore: President Trump had arranged a screening at the White House with director and star Nick Searcy in April. Now it was time for liberals to pounce.

Advertisement

Suddenly it was the progressives who were pearl-clutching prudes. POLITICO called it “graphic” (it’s not, at all), and Searcy called out the Slate writer who said “gory” was “a factual description of this movie,” challenging her to tell her readers “the exact time code at which @gosnellmovie ‘depicts second- and third-trimester abortions in gruesome detail,” as she’d written in her piece.

In short, practically no one reporting on the bloody, graphic, gory, and gruesome “Gosnell” had actually seen it.

It took The New Yorker a while to get around to covering it, and writer Jia Tolentino described it as “the transparently racist, repulsive criminal-justice movie that was recently screened in Donald Trump’s White House.”

Yes, the movie was about criminal justice — Kermit Gosnell is a convicted criminal — but “transparently racist”? Searcy must be amazed in retrospect as the movie’s director to have missed all the gore and transparent racism.

Advertisement

Was it racist because it depicted the black guy as a bad guy? Just because a couple of black women died in his clinic, whose basement was stuffed with the remains of 47 babies who’d been delivered and their spinal cords cut? Because he cut off babies’ feet and kept them in jars?

Advertisement

Seriously, is “racist” a word writers just throw in there to bump up the word count or what?


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos