ABC News' Debate Moderator's Fact-Check on Trump Has Aged Badly, but DON'T Expect...
MSNBC's Chris Hayes Says Media Not Sounding Nearly Enough Panic About 'Fascist' Trump
Try Not to Laugh While Kamala Harris Warns Voters That Trump Will Weaponize...
Daily Wire Tracked Down Person Who Started Dishonest 'Harris Wins' Account (Just Guess)
FBI Revises Crime Data and That Sound You Hear Is Another Dem/Media Narrative...
WATCH: Whooo Boy, Thomas Massie Just Put the CDC On Blast
Spinning Like a Broken Record: Kamala Tries Moving Needle with Black Voters at...
The Force Up and LEFT Him! Mark Hamill Embarrasses Himself YET Again
Justice for Trooper: DeSantis Presses Charges Against Man Who Abandoned Dog to Hurricane...
Politico: Federal Employees Are Sweating a Trump Comeback
Kamala Harris Tells Charlamagne tha God There's No Question Reparations Have to Be...
'You Have Lost Your Damn Mind' - Harris Campaign's Desperate Play for Black...
NYT: Donald Trump Spreads His Politics of Grievance to Nonwhite Voters
Bret Baier Should Ask Kamala Harris These Three Questions
Dana Loesch Destroys Tim Walz’s Elmer Fudd Hunting Photo Op

Christine Blasey Ford's lawyers trying to dictate which news outlets are allowed to cover her

The Washington Times is reporting Tuesday that Christine Blasey Ford’s lawyers are attempting to dictate exactly how her testimony will be covered, right down to the number of cameras and which press agencies will be allowed to take pictures.

Advertisement

Stephen Dinan and Rowan Scarborough report:

Michael Bromwich said in emails sent Tuesday afternoon that he was requesting access for three “robocams,” three specific wire services, photographers from the Associated Press, Reuters and one unspecified service, and a pool reporter for newspapers and magazines. In a follow-up email he specified that the robocams should be operated by “the CSPAN TV pool,” and said he also wanted space for a radio reporter.

While committees sometimes limit press based on space at hearings, and some witnesses have arranged to have their identities shielded, longtime Capitol Hill watchers struggled to think of precedent for a witness dictating terms of press coverage.

Are we the only ones who think it’s ridiculous that one accuser with precious little evidence is dictating a seemingly endless list of conditions that must be met for her to appear?

Advertisement

Advertisement

Good one.


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement