Here's ANOTHER Pic of Gov. Whitmer In the Oval Office With Trump (at...
Social Security Admin Helped Get Fearmongering Elizabeth Warren Community Note Nuked
Rep. Eric Swalwell Yelling Into a Bullhorn to Encourage a Few Protesters Speaks...
OOPS! End Wokeness DEMOLISHES the Left's Gaslighting About Plane Crashes With a Simple...
Somebody Make Sure Hillary Clinton Sees the Video Trump Just Posted Where She...
Judiciary Dems' Month-Old Tweet About Mahmoud Khalil Is Aging Worse by the Minute
Proposed Cuts to NOAA Have Lefties Melting Down Faster than Polar Ice Caps...
Lawrence O’Donnell Spreads Lie Trump Can Round Up American Citizens and Fly Them...
Election Deflection: James Carville Says There’s Voter Fraud but the SAVE Act Is...
Victor Davis Hanson: If One Wanted to Destroy the U.S. the Last Four...
Capitol Check-Ups: Marjorie Taylor Greene Wants Lawmakers to Pass Physicals and Undergo Dr...
On the Road (Again): Bernie Sanders Has Been on the ‘Fighting Oligarchy’ Tour...
You Don't Have to Go Home But You Can't Stay Here: Judge Rules...
Modern Audiences Don't Exist, but Hollywood Is Trying Hard to Create Them
BBC Journos Aghast a Politician Bases Her Views In Reality and Not on...

Were FBI agents 'pulling punches' on the Hillary Clinton investigation? More texts released

As Twitchy reported Thursday morning, the Justice Department recovered those missing texts between FBI agent Peter Strzok and lawyer Lisa Page, and they raise some very serious questions about how the FBI treated its investigation of Hillary Clinton and her handling of classified documents.

Advertisement

As The Daily Caller reports, Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley says the texts suggest the FBI was “pulling punches” in its investigation of Clinton.

In the text message flagged by Grassley, Page suggested that Strzok should not take an aggressive approach to Clinton because of the strong possibility that she would be elected president.

“One more thing: she might be our next president. The last thing you need us going in there loaded for bear. You think she’s going to remember or care that it was more doj than fbi?” Page wrote.

Strzok said he agreed with that assessment.

“I called Bill and relayed what we discussed. He agrees. I will email you and [redacted] same.”

“Bill” is likely Bill Priestap, the FBI’s chief of counterintelligence.

The more that’s uncovered, the more it seems people were really, really counting on Hillary Clinton being elected.

Advertisement

CNN adds:

In other exchanges, in March and May of 2016, the pair reference an internal FBI discussion about a potential “special prosecutor” that was making top bureau officials “stressed.” The texts came as public pressure was mounting from Republicans on Capitol Hill to appoint a special counsel or prosecutor in the Clinton case.

Internal FBI discussions about the need for a special prosecutor have not been previously detailed.

Even CNN’s Chris Cillizza agrees that these newly uncovered texts are bad news for the FBI.

https://twitter.com/MattWolking/status/956655896767102976

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/Gooms/status/956702432758710272

Don’t forget: In December, CNN reported that Strzok was the one who softened the language in James Comey’s draft of his decision on the Clinton case from “grossly negligent,” a phrase with legal implications for Clinton, to “extremely careless.”

https://twitter.com/est1608/status/956666240654700545

https://twitter.com/SecBlasphemy/status/956682835250860043

Advertisement

We haven’t seen James Comey tweet any quotes tonight, but we’ll be keeping an eye out in case he has something to add.


Related:

‘Pretty damning’: FBI agent dismissed from Mueller probe did what?

Did Peter Strzok suspect ‘there’s no big there there’ in the Russian collusion investigation?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement